Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31450903›Full record

ArticleAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2019

Comparison Analysis of Linear Discriminant Analysis and Cuckoo-Search Algorithm in the Classification of Breast Cancer from Digital Mammograms.

Sannasi Chakravarthy S R, Harikumar Rajaguru

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sannasi Chakravarthy S RDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Anna University (Bannari Amman Institute of Technology), Sathyamangalam, India.Email:elektroniqz@gmail.comORCID 0000-0002-0162-7206
Harikumar RajaguruDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Anna University (Bannari Amman Institute of Technology), Sathyamangalam, India.Email:elektroniqz@gmail.com
Anna University, Chennai · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Breast cancer is the most common invasive severity which leads to the second primary cause of death among women. The objective of this paper is to propose a computer-aided approach for the breast cancer classification from the digital mammograms. Methods: Designing an effective classification approach will assist in resolving the difficulties in analyzing digital mammograms. The proposed work utilized the Mammogram Image Analysis Society (MIAS) database for the analysis of breast cancer. Five distinct wavelet families are used for extraction of features from the mammograms of MIAS database. These extracted features are statistical in nature and served as input to the Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) and Cuckoo-Search Algorithm (CSA) classifiers. Results: Error rate, Sensitivity, Specificity and Accuracy are the performance measures used and the obtained results clearly state that the CSA used as a classifier affords an accuracy of 97.5% while compared with the LDA classifier. Conclusion: The results of comparative performance analysis show that the CSA classifier outperforms the performance of LDA in terms of breast cancer classification.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDiscriminant AnalysisBreast NeoplasmsDatabases, FactualDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMammographyPrognosisbreast cancercuckoo-searchdiscriminant AnalysisMammogram

Identifiers

PMID31450903
PMCPMC6852837
OpenAlexW2969425017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.