Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31450887›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Chemical Society2019

Unified Model for Photophysical and Electro-Optical Properties of Green Fluorescent Proteins.

Chi-Yun Lin, Matthew G Romei, Luke M Oltrogge, Irimpan I Mathews, Steven G Boxer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Tuning Polyacrylate Composition to Recognize and Modulate Fluorescent Proteins.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. DNA-Regulated Multi-Protein Complement Control.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chi-Yun LinDepartment of Chemistry , Stanford University , Stanford , California 94305 , United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6555-8767
Matthew G RomeiDepartment of Chemistry , Stanford University , Stanford , California 94305 , United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6798-7493
Luke M OltroggeDepartment of Chemistry , Stanford University , Stanford , California 94305 , United States.
Irimpan I MathewsStanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource , 2575 Sand Hill Road , Menlo Park , California 94025 , United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6254-3519
Steven G BoxerDepartment of Chemistry , Stanford University , Stanford , California 94305 , United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9167-4286

Funding

X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy (XAS) pp.711-759P41GM103393 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI HODGSON, KEITH O · 2012 to 2019
$30.6M
Biophysical Studies of Macromolecules and Molecular AssembliesR35GM118044 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI STEVEN G. BOXER · 2016 to 2026
$7.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103393NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM118044
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Green fluorescent proteins (GFPs) have become indispensable imaging and optogenetic tools. Their absorption and emission properties can be optimized for specific applications. Currently, no unified framework exists to comprehensively describe these photophysical properties, namely the absorption maxima, emission maxima, Stokes shifts, vibronic progressions, extinction coefficients, Stark tuning rates, and spontaneous emission rates, especially one that includes the effects of the protein environment. In this work, we study the correlations among these properties from systematically tuned GFP environmental mutants and chromophore variants. Correlation plots reveal monotonic trends, suggesting that all these properties are governed by one underlying factor dependent on the chromophore's environment. By treating the anionic GFP chromophore as a mixed-valence compound existing as a superposition of two resonance forms, we argue that this underlying factor is defined as the difference in energy between the two forms, or the driving force, which is tuned by the environment. We then introduce a Marcus-Hush model with the bond length alternation vibrational mode, treating the GFP absorption band as an intervalence charge transfer band. This model explains all of the observed strong correlations among photophysical properties; related subtopics are extensively discussed in the Supporting Information. Finally, we demonstrate the model's predictive power by utilizing the additivity of the driving force. The model described here elucidates the role of the protein environment in modulating the photophysical properties of the chromophore, providing insights and limitations for designing new GFPs with desired phenotypes. We argue that this model should also be generally applicable to both biological and nonbiological polymethine dyes.

Indexed as

Green Fluorescent ProteinsModels, MolecularMolecular StructureMutationOptics and PhotonicsPhotochemical ProcessesGreen Fluorescent Proteins

Identifiers

PMID31450887
PMCPMC7047497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.