Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31450692›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2019

Potential Fluid Biomarkers for the Diagnosis of Mild Cognitive Impairment.

Vo Van Giau, Eva Bagyinszky, Seong Soo A An

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Specific Binding of Alzheimer's Aβ Peptides to Extracellular Vesicles.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Vo Van GiauDepartment of BionanoTechnology, Gachon University, 1342 Sungnam Daero, Sungnamsi 13120, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-9937-7865
Eva BagyinszkyDepartment of BionanoTechnology, Gachon University, 1342 Sungnam Daero, Sungnamsi 13120, Korea. navigator120@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-0487-8668
Seong Soo A AnDepartment of BionanoTechnology, Gachon University, 1342 Sungnam Daero, Sungnamsi 13120, Korea. seongaan@gachon.ac.kr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is characterized by a level of cognitive impairment that is lower than normal for a person's age, but a higher function than that that observed in a demented person. MCI represents a transitional state between normal aging and dementia disorders, especially Alzheimer's disease (AD). Much effort has been made towards determining the prognosis of a person with MCI who will convert to AD. It is now clear that cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) levels of Aβ40, Aβ42, total tau and phosphorylated tau are useful for predicting the risk of progression from MCI to AD. This review highlights the advantages of the current blood-based biomarkers in MCI, and discusses some of these challenges, with an emphasis on recent studies to provide an overview of the current state of MCI.

Indexed as

BiomarkersAnimalsAtrophyBrainCirculating MicroRNACognitive DysfunctionDiagnosis, DifferentialDisease ProgressionHumansMicroRNAsPrognosisBiomarkersCirculating MicroRNAMicroRNAsAlzheimer’s diseasebiomarkersdiagnosismild cognitive impairment

Identifiers

PMID31450692
PMCPMC6747411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.