Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31450680›Full record

ReviewViruses2019

New Markers in Monitoring the Reactivation of Hepatitis B Virus Infection in Immunocompromised Hosts.

Valentina Svicher, Romina Salpini, Vincenzo Malagnino, Lorenzo Piermatteo, Mohammad Alkhatib, Carlotta Cerva, Loredana Sarmati

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Viruses, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Valentina SvicherDepartment of Experimental Medicine and Surgery, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2377-504X
Romina SalpiniDepartment of Experimental Medicine and Surgery, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2488-2082
Vincenzo MalagninoClinic of Infectious Diseases, Department of System Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy.
Lorenzo PiermatteoDepartment of Experimental Medicine and Surgery, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3500-0858
Mohammad AlkhatibDepartment of Experimental Medicine and Surgery, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy.
Carlotta CervaClinic of Infectious Diseases, Department of System Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9060-7313
Loredana SarmatiClinic of Infectious Diseases, Department of System Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy. sarmati@med.uniroma2.it.ORCID 0000-0003-1452-0333
University of Rome Tor Vergata · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) persistence is at the basis of HBV reactivation as a consequence of chemotherapy and immunosuppressive treatments. The identification of early viral replication indicators and markers of effective HBV immunological control would be useful in monitoring patients who are at risk of potential viral reactivation during the course of immunosuppressive treatment. Currently, international guidelines have shared some criteria to identify patients with a low, medium or high risk of HBV reactivation; however, permanently placing a patient in a definitive category is not always easy. More often, patients move from one category to another during the course of their immunosuppressive treatment; therefore, in many cases, there are no precise indicators or tools for monitoring possible reactivation and establishing the duration and suspension of antiviral prophylaxis. Historically, the sequence of HBV antigens and antibodies and HBV DNA levels has been used to evaluate the different stages of the acute and chronic phases of an HBV infection. In the last few years, new biomarkers, such as anti-HBs and anti-HBc titres, HBV core-related antigen (HBcrAg), ultra-sensitive HBsAg evaluation and HBV RNA, have been used in patients with an HBV infection to evaluate their diagnostic and prognostic potential. The aim of this review is to evaluate the published results on the use of new infection markers in the diagnosis and monitoring of HBV reactivation over the course of immunosuppressive treatments. Moreover, the importance of viral genotypic studies was emphasized, given the diagnostic and therapeutic implications of the mutational profiles of HBsAg during the HBV reactivation phase.

Indexed as

BiomarkersHepatitis BDNA, ViralFemaleHepatitis B AntibodiesHepatitis B Surface AntigensHepatitis B virusHumansImmunocompromised HostMaleRNA, ViralVirus ActivationBiomarkersDNA, ViralHepatitis B AntibodiesHepatitis B Surface AntigensRNA, Viralanti-HBcAbHBcrAgHBsAgHBVHBV core related antigenHBV-DNAHBV markersHBV-RNAhepatitis B infectionimmunocompromised host

Identifiers

PMID31450680
PMCPMC6784136
OpenAlexW2969515027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.