Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31449732›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of health psychology2019

Tinnitus groups: A model of social support and social connectedness from peer interaction.

Helen Pryce, Tiago Moutela, Colette Bunker, Rachel Shaw

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of health psychology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. The psychosocial experiences of adults diagnosed with coeliac disease: a qualitative evidence synthesis.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. What is the burden of tinnitus?Frontiers in psychology · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Surrounded by Sound: The Impact of Tinnitus on Musicians.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Coping With Tinnitus During the COVID-19 Pandemic.American journal of audiology · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Helen PryceDepartment of Audiology, School of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5183-6236
Tiago MoutelaDepartment of Audiology, School of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, UK.
Colette BunkerBritish Tinnitus Association, Unit 5, Acorn Business Park, Sheffield, UK.
Rachel ShawDepartment of Psychology, School of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tinnitus is a chronic condition for which there is no medical treatment. Tinnitus groups are a widely available resource for people with tinnitus.

objectivesOur objectives were to explore the active ingredients of tinnitus support groups in terms of their mechanisms for providing support, the contextual factors that elicit such mechanisms, and the outcomes in terms of coping enhancement.

designWe adopted a pluralist and iterative approach informed by the realist evaluation method.

methodsWe conducted ethnographic data generation at tinnitus support groups involving observations (n = 160), focus groups (n = 130), and individual interviews (n = 20). Inductive analyses were conducted following the constant comparison method of grounded theory. We then interrogated the inductive themes to identify evidence of Contexts, Mechanisms, and Outcomes. We then produced a model which was tested in a survey of tinnitus group members (n = 65) in effect providing large-scale respondent validation of the data-driven model created through our inductive analysis.

resultsWe identified that tinnitus groups can facilitate social connectedness between group members. This experience appeared to build resilience among those experiencing tinnitus-related distress. Groups also played a role in building a sense of control related to knowledge and information sharing. Additionally, we identified risks associated with not accessing social support in a group environment.

conclusionsOur findings contribute to the growing understanding of the power of social connectedness as building shared social identity when living with tinnitus. Statement of contribution What is already known on this subject? Tinnitus is a prevalent condition with approximately 10-15% of the population experiencing a spontaneous sound without obvious source. Tinnitus is an invisible health and chronic condition. People with tinnitus experience high levels of distress, anxiety, and depression. Group support is beneficial to people with many health problems. What does this study add? This study describes the mechanisms by which tinnitus support groups can support coping in tinnitus. This is the first study to comprehensively explore the views of those who attend tinnitus groups. The study identifies the key features of support groups that facilitate social connectedness among group members. The most valued features of groups are the knowledge and information provided, the sense of belonging communicated to group members, and the creation and maintenance of a sense of hope towards the tinnitus. This study contributes new insights to both the tinnitus field and adds to the literature on support groups in health.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalInterpersonal RelationsPeer GroupSocial SupportAdultChronic DiseaseFemaleHumansMaleSelf-Help GroupsTinnitusUnited Kingdomsocial connectednesssocial supporttinnitustinnitus support groups

Identifiers

PMID31449732
PMCPMC6899850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.