Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31449696›Full record

ArticleIndoor air2019

Quantification of the impact of cooking processes on indoor concentrations of volatile organic species and primary and secondary organic aerosols.

Felix Klein, Urs Baltensperger, André S H Prévôt, Imad El Haddad

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indoor air, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. On the Detection and Scope of "Third-Hand Vaping": A Critical Review of the Literature.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Felix KleinLaboratory of Atmospheric Chemistry, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-3680-4735
Urs BaltenspergerLaboratory of Atmospheric Chemistry, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland.
André S H PrévôtLaboratory of Atmospheric Chemistry, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland.
Imad El HaddadLaboratory of Atmospheric Chemistry, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland.
Paul Scherrer Institute · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cooking is recognized as an important source of particulate pollution in indoor and outdoor environments. We conducted more than 100 individual experiments to characterize the particulate and non-methane organic gas emissions from various cooking processes, their reaction rates, and their secondary organic aerosol yields. We used this emission data to develop a box model, for simulating the cooking emission concentrations in a typical European home and the indoor gas-phase reactions leading to secondary organic aerosol production. Our results suggest that about half of the indoor primary organic aerosol emission rates can be explained by cooking. Emission rates of larger and unsaturated aldehydes likely are dominated by cooking while the emission rates of terpenes are negligible. We found that cooking dominates the particulate and gas-phase air pollution in non-smoking European households exceeding 1000 μg m

Indexed as

AerosolsAir PollutantsAir Pollution, IndoorAldehydesCookingEnvironmental MonitoringHumansRestaurantsTerpenesVolatile Organic CompoundsAerosolsAir PollutantsAldehydesTerpenesVolatile Organic CompoundsCooking emissionsHR-TOF-AMSIndoor air qualityPOAPTR-TOF-MSSOA

Identifiers

PMID31449696
PMCPMC6856830
OpenAlexW2970454535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.