Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31449568›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2019

Muscle activity of Bulgarian squat. Effects of additional vibration, suspension and unstable surface.

Joan Aguilera-Castells, Bernat Buscà, Jose Morales, Mònica Solana-Tramunt, Azahara Fort-Vanmeerhaeghe, Fernando Rey-Abella, Jaume Bantulà, Javier Peña

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Assessment of the Speed and Power of Push-Ups Performed on Surfaces with Different Degrees of Instability.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Influence of the Amount of Instability on the Leg Muscle Activity During a Loaded Free Barbell Half-Squat.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Joan Aguilera-CastellsFaculty of Psychology, Education Sciences and Sport Blanquerna, Ramon Llull University, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7665-0235
Bernat BuscàFaculty of Psychology, Education Sciences and Sport Blanquerna, Ramon Llull University, Barcelona, Spain.
Jose MoralesFaculty of Psychology, Education Sciences and Sport Blanquerna, Ramon Llull University, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5165-5195
Mònica Solana-TramuntFaculty of Psychology, Education Sciences and Sport Blanquerna, Ramon Llull University, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0388-2726
Azahara Fort-VanmeerhaegheFaculty of Psychology, Education Sciences and Sport Blanquerna, Ramon Llull University, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5071-1084
Fernando Rey-AbellaSchool of Health Science Blanquerna, Ramon Llull University, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5006-2638
Jaume BantulàFaculty of Psychology, Education Sciences and Sport Blanquerna, Ramon Llull University, Barcelona, Spain.
Javier PeñaSport and Physical Activity Studies Center (CEEAF), University of Vic - Central University of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1692-311X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Practitioners of strength and conditioning are increasingly using vibration and unstable environments to enhance training effects. However, little evidence has been found comparing the use of suspension devices and vibratory platforms used in the Bulgarian squat. The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to examine the effect of suspension devices (TRX®), unstable surfaces (BOSU®), and vibration plates on muscle activity and force during the Bulgarian squat. Twenty physically active male students (age = 24.40 ± 3.63 years) performed a set of five repetitions of Bulgarian squats, suspended lunges, suspended lunges-BOSU, suspended lunges-Vibro30, and suspended lunges-Vibro40 (vibration 30 Hz or 40 Hz and 4 mm of amplitude). A randomized within-subject design was used to compare leg muscle activity, vertical ground reaction forces, and force exerted on the strap across the five exercises. Results showed no significant differences in muscle activity between the Bulgarian squat and suspended lunge (p = 0.109, d = 2.84). However, the suspended lunge significantly decreased muscle activation compared to the suspended lunge-BOSU (p = 0.012, d = 0.47), suspended lunge-Vibro30 (p = 0.001, d = 1.26), and suspended lunge-Vibro40 (p = 0.000, d = 1.51). Likewise, the Bulgarian squat achieved lower activity than the suspended lunge-Vibro40 (p = 0.010, d = 0.96). The force on the strap significantly decreased in the suspended lunge-BOSU compared to the suspended lunge-Vibro30 (p = 0.009, d = 0.56). The suspended lunge achieved higher front leg force production than the Bulgarian squat (p = 0.006, d = 0.48). In conclusion, leaning the rear leg on a suspension device does not provoke an increase in the activation of the front leg during the Bulgarian squat but increases the vertical ground reaction forces. Thus, the use of unstable surfaces or vibration plates for the front leg increased muscular activity when performing a suspended lunge.

Indexed as

VibrationAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaBulgariaElectromyographyExerciseHumansIsometric ContractionMaleMuscle, SkeletalReproducibility of ResultsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31449568
PMCPMC6709890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.