ArticlePloS one2019
Clinical features of chronic cluster headache based on the third edition of the International Classification of Headache Disorders: A prospective multicentre study.
Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Prevalence and Incidence of Cluster Headache: A Norwegian Population-Based Time-Trend Study.Neurology · 2026Article
- Inverse association of obesity with bout periodicity in episodic cluster headache: a multicenter cross-sectional study.The journal of headache and pain · 2025Observational
- The Prevalence and Clinical Phenotypes of Cluster Headache in Relation with Latitude.Current pain and headache reports · 2024Review
- Brazilian headache registry: methods and preliminary data of the pilot study.Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria · 2023Observational
- Clinical Profile of Chronic Cluster Headaches in a Regional Headache Center in Japan.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2023Article
- Diagnostic Delay and Its Predictors in Cluster Headache.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
- Smoking History and Clinical Features of Cluster Headache: Results from the Korean Cluster Headache Registry.Journal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea) · 2021Article
- Chronic Cluster Headache with a Pediatric Onset: The First Japanese Case Report.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2020Article
- Cluster headache in Asian populations: Similarities, disparities, and a narrative review of the mechanisms of the chronic subtype.Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache · 2020Review
- The impact of remission and coexisting migraine on anxiety and depression in cluster headache.The journal of headache and pain · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors at 16 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The criterion for the remission period of chronic cluster headache (CCH) was recently revised from < 1 month to < 3 months in the third edition of the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD-3). However, information on the clinical features of CCH based on the ICHD-3 criteria is currently limited. The present study aimed to investigate the clinical features of CCH based on ICHD-3 using data from the Korean Cluster Headache Registry (KCHR). The KCHR is a multicentre prospective registry of patients with cluster headache (CH) from 15 hospitals. Among the 250 participants with CH, 12 and 176 participants were classified as having CCH and episodic cluster headache (ECH), respectively. Among 12 participants with CCH, 6 (50%) had remission periods of < 1 month, and the remaining 6 (50%) had a remission period of 1-3 months. Six participants had CCH from the time of onset of CH, and in the other 6 participants, CCH evolved from ECH. CCH subjects had later age of onset of CH, developed the condition after a longer interval after CH onset, and had more migraine and less nasal congestion and/or rhinorrhoea than ECH subjects. Clinical features of CCH with remission periods < 1 month were not significantly different from those of CCH with remission periods of 1-3 months, except for the total number of bouts. More current smoking and less diurnal rhythmicity were observed in participants with CCH evolved from ECH compared to those with ECH. In conclusion, the number of subjects with CCH doubled when the revised ICHD-3 criteria were used. Most of clinical characteristics of CCH did not differ when the previous and current version of ICHD was applied and compared. Some clinical features of CCH were different from those of ECH, and smoking may have a role in CH chronification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.