ArticlePloS one2019
Caveolae and scaffold detection from single molecule localization microscopy data using deep learning.
Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Caveolae mechanics in cellular functions and disease.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2026Review
- Adversarial Erasing Enhanced Multiple Instance Learning (siMILe): Discriminative Identification of Oligomeric Protein Structures in Single Molecule Localization Microscopy.Advanced intelligent systems (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Article
- ClusterNet: Classifying Single-Molecule Localization Microscopy Datasets with Graph-Based Deep Learning of Supracluster Structure.Small science · 2025Article
- SuperResNET: Model-Free Single-Molecule Network Analysis Software Achieves Molecular Resolution of Nup96.Advanced intelligent systems (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025Article
- The role of Caveolin-1 in tumor-derived extracellular vesicle biology and its implications.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Review
- AI analysis of super-resolution microscopy: Biological discovery in the absence of ground truth.The Journal of cell biology · 2024Review
- Recent development of computational cluster analysis methods for single-molecule localization microscopy images.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Review
- Caveolin-1 in Müller Glia Exists as Heat-Resistant, High Molecular Weight Complexes.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023Article
- Caveolar and non-Caveolar Caveolin-1 in ocular homeostasis and disease.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2022Review
- Single molecule network analysis identifies structural changes to caveolae and scaffolds due to mutation of the caveolin-1 scaffolding domain.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Challenges facing quantitative large-scale optical super-resolution, and some simple solutions.iScience · 2021Review
- Efficient Cross-Correlation Filtering of One- and Two-Color Single Molecule Localization Microscopy Data.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2021Review
- A Review of Super-Resolution Single-Molecule Localization Microscopy Cluster Analysis and Quantification Methods.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2020Review
- The importance of caveolins and caveolae to dermatology: Lessons from the caves and beyond.Experimental dermatology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Caveolae are plasma membrane invaginations whose formation requires caveolin-1 (Cav1), the adaptor protein polymerase I, and the transcript release factor (PTRF or CAVIN1). Caveolae have an important role in cell functioning, signaling, and disease. In the absence of CAVIN1/PTRF, Cav1 forms non-caveolar membrane domains called scaffolds. In this work, we train machine learning models to automatically distinguish between caveolae and scaffolds from single molecule localization microscopy (SMLM) data. We apply machine learning algorithms to discriminate biological structures from SMLM data. Our work is the first that is leveraging machine learning approaches (including deep learning models) to automatically identifying biological structures from SMLM data. In particular, we develop and compare three binary classification methods to identify whether or not a given 3D cluster of Cav1 proteins is a caveolae. The first uses a random forest classifier applied to 28 hand-crafted/designed features, the second uses a convolutional neural net (CNN) applied to a projection of the point clouds onto three planes, and the third uses a PointNet model, a recent development that can directly take point clouds as its input. We validate our methods on a dataset of super-resolution microscopy images of PC3 prostate cancer cells labeled for Cav1. Specifically, we have images from two cell populations: 10 PC3 and 10 CAVIN1/PTRF-transfected PC3 cells (PC3-PTRF cells) that form caveolae. We obtained a balanced set of 1714 different cellular structures. Our results show that both the random forest on hand-designed features and the deep learning approach achieve high accuracy in distinguishing the intrinsic features of the caveolae and non-caveolae biological structures. More specifically, both random forest and deep CNN classifiers achieve classification accuracy reaching 94% on our test set, while the PointNet model only reached 83% accuracy. We also discuss the pros and cons of the different approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.