ArticlePloS one2019
Provider preference for payment method under a national health insurance scheme: A survey of health insurance-credentialed health care providers in Ghana.
Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ghana's Diagnosis Related Grouping (G-DRG) tariffs versus hospital charges: implications for inpatient care financing at a secondary hospital in Ghana.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2026Article
- Health care provider payment reforms in African states of the Commonwealth-a scoping review.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Sustainable financing for vaccination towards advancing universal health coverage in the WHO African region: The strategic role of national health insurance.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2024Article
- Procedural fairness in decision-making for financing a National Health Insurance Scheme: a case study from The Gambia.Health policy and planning · 2023Review
- Preferences of healthcare workers for provider payment systems in The Gambia's National Health Insurance Scheme.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Exploring the roles of players in strategic purchasing for healthcare in Africa-a scoping review.Health policy and planning · 2023Article
- Barriers and Facilitators to Health-Care Provider Payment Reform - A Scoping Literature Review.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2023Article
- The effect of the capitation policy withdrawal on maternal health service provision in Ashanti Region, Ghana: an interrupted time series analysis.Global health research and policy · 2022Article
- Benefit-cost analysis of electronic claims processing under Ghana's National Health Insurance Scheme.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGhana introduced capitation payment method in 2012 but was faced with resistance from provider groups and civil society organizations for its perceived negative effects on quality care delivery. This study seeks to explore the views of providers to understand their preferred payment method for the various types of services they provide in order to inform the discussion and negotiations during this period of reform. Findings will not only aid the National Health Insurance Authority (NHIA) to improve the implementation arrangements but also provide useful inputs for other low and middle-income countries (LMICs) in their quest to reform their provider payment systems. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional survey of 200 credentialed health care providers' in the three regions of Ghana on providers' preference for payment method. We administered closed-ended questionnaires employing 5-point Likert scales for measurement of payment method preference. Descriptive and regression analysis were performed to examine healthcare providers' background characteristics and their association with preferred payment method for primary care.
resultsIn general, health care providers prefer the Ghana-Diagnosis-Related Grouping (G-DRG) payment method to fee-for-service and capitation payment methods. Result of bivariate analyses showed that healthcare providers' preference for payment method for primary outpatient services differed significantly by their region of residence (p<0.001). The multinomial logic model showed that being a female (p = 0.013) or healthcare provider in the Volta region (p = 0.008) was significantly associated with health provider preference for G-DRG payment method relative to fee-for-service. Similarly, being a healthcare provider in the Volta region (p = 0.026) or Medical Assistant (p = 0.032) was significantly associated with capitation relative to fee-for-service payment method.
conclusionWe conclude that the most preferred payment method across all regions is the G-DRG. However, whereas providers in the Volta region are not willing to accept capitation as payment method, this was not the case in Ashanti and Central regions. Capitation payment method as an option for primary care services in Ghana should, therefore, not be ruled out of the discussion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.