Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31448974›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2019

Computationally optimized broadly reactive vaccine based upon swine H1N1 influenza hemagglutinin sequences protects against both swine and human isolated viruses.

Amanda L Skarlupka, Simon O Owino, Lui P Suzuki-Williams, Corey J Crevar, Donald M Carter, Ted M Ross

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Amanda L SkarlupkaCenter for Vaccines and Immunology, University of Georgia , Athens , GA , USA.
Simon O OwinoCenter for Vaccines and Immunology, University of Georgia , Athens , GA , USA.
Lui P Suzuki-WilliamsCenter for Vaccines and Immunology, University of Georgia , Athens , GA , USA.
Corey J CrevarVaccine and Gene Therapy Institute of Florida , Port St. Lucie , FL , USA.
Donald M CarterCenter for Vaccines and Immunology, University of Georgia , Athens , GA , USA.
Ted M RossCenter for Vaccines and Immunology, University of Georgia , Athens , GA , USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1947-7469
University of Georgia · USVaccine & Gene Therapy Institute of Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Swine H1 influenza viruses were stable within pigs for nearly 70 years until in 1998 when a classical swine virus reassorted with avian and human influenza viruses to generate the novel triple reassortant H1N1 strain that eventually led to the 2009 influenza pandemic. Previously, our group demonstrated broad protection against a panel of human H1N1 viruses using HA antigens derived by the COBRA methodology. In this report, the effectiveness of COBRA HA antigens (SW1, SW2, SW3 and SW4), which were designed using only HA sequences from swine H1N1 and H1N2 isolates, were tested in BALB/c mice. The effectiveness of these vaccines were compared to HA sequences designed using both human and swine H1 HA sequences or human only sequences. SW2 and SW4 elicited antibodies that detected the pandemic-like virus, A/California/07/2009 (CA/09), had antibodies with HAI activity against almost all the classical swine influenza viruses isolated from 1973-2015 and all of the Eurasian viruses in our panel. However, sera collected from mice vaccinated with SW2 or SW4 had HAI activity against ~25% of the human seasonal-like influenza viruses isolated from 2009-2015. In contrast, the P1 COBRA HA vaccine (derived from both swine and human HA sequences) elicited antibodies that had HAI activity against both swine and human H1 viruses and protected against CA/09 challenge, but not a human seasonal-like swine H1N2 virus challenge. However, the SW1 vaccine protected against this challenge as well as the homologous vaccine. These results support the idea that a pan-swine-human H1 influenza virus vaccine is possible.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, ViralAntigens, ViralComputers, MolecularFemaleHemagglutinin Glycoproteins, Influenza VirusHumansInfluenza A Virus, H1N1 SubtypeInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesMiceMice, Inbred BALB COrthomyxoviridae InfectionsSwineVaccines, Virus-Like ParticleAntibodies, ViralAntigens, ViralHemagglutinin Glycoproteins, Influenza VirusInfluenza VaccinesVaccines, Virus-Like ParticleCOBRAH1N1hemagglutination-inhibitioninfluenzamice

Identifiers

PMID31448974
PMCPMC6773400
OpenAlexW2971065998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.