Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31448869›Full record

ArticlePsychology and psychotherapy2020

Adult mental health practitioner beliefs about psychosis, parenting, and the role of the practitioner: A Q methodological investigation.

Hope Adderley, Anja Wittkowski, Rachel Calam, Lynsey Gregg

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychology and psychotherapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A scoping review of Q-methodology in healthcare research.BMC medical research methodology · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hope AdderleySchool of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7467-1040
Anja WittkowskiSchool of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, UK.
Rachel CalamSchool of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, UK.
Lynsey GreggSchool of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5683-5574
Manchester Academic Health Science Centre · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThere is a lack of research into parenting interventions for families which include a parent experiencing psychosis or other serious mental illness (SMI). Preliminary findings highlight the potential benefits of adult mental health practitioners supporting parents experiencing SMI by using self-directed parenting interventions. This study explored beliefs relating to parenting and psychosis held by practitioners working in adult mental health settings, specifically examining their beliefs about the parenting needs of adults experiencing psychosis who have dependent children, as well as their role as adult mental health practitioners.

designThis study used Q methodology to explore the beliefs of mental health practitioners on psychosis and parenting.

methodsTwenty-one adult mental health practitioners ranked 58 items according to how much they agreed with the belief statement presented. Participants also provided additional written information and interviews to contextualize the Q methodology data.

resultsThree factors emerged representing three groups of practitioners with similar beliefs around psychosis and parenting. Factors were labelled: 'Parenting interventions are worthwhile, and I'd deliver them', 'Parenting interventions are worthwhile, but I'm not confident to deliver them', and 'Parenting interventions might be worthwhile, but it's not my responsibility'.

conclusionUsing parenting interventions as part of their clinical work was acceptable to most practitioners; however, some lacked confidence in their ability to work in a family-focused way. Efforts now need to focus on enhancing practitioners' skill, knowledge, and confidence in family-focused approaches to provide increased and improved support to families which include a parent experiencing psychosis or other SMI. PRACTITIONER POINTS: Parenting interventions need to be made more available and accessible to parents experiencing serious mental illness (SMI), such as psychosis. Adult mental health practitioners are willing to incorporate parenting interventions into their work with parents accessing their services, but some lack confidence to do this. These results highlight the importance of equipping practitioners with the skill, knowledge, and confidence to engage in family-focused approaches. Further research needs to involve parents experiencing SMI as well practitioners working in adult mental health services.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelHealth Services ResearchMental HealthAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedParentingProfessional RolePsychotic DisordersQ-Sortadult servicescliniciansmental healthparentQ methodologyserious mental illness

Identifiers

PMID31448869
PMCPMC7687147
OpenAlexW2964444062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.