Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31448681›Full record

ArticleStatistical methods in medical research2020

Inverse probability weighted Cox model in multi-site studies without sharing individual-level data.

Di Shu, Kazuki Yoshida, Bruce H Fireman, Sengwee Toh

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistical methods in medical research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07098078 completednot on this map

Domperidone Dose and the Risk of Serious Adverse Events in Older Adults With Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease: A Population-Based Cohort Study Research Protocol

TypeobservationalSponsorLondon Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph'sRan2008 to 2024Enrolled15,000ConditionsChronic Kidney Disease (CKD)ArmsDomperidone (drug)
NCT07431515 completednot on this map

The Long-term Risk of Cardiovascular Disease and Mortality in Living Kidney Donors

TypeobservationalSponsorLondon Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph'sRan1992 to 2025Enrolled50,000ConditionsLiving Donor Nephrectomy, Living Kidney Donation, Living Kidney Donor, Living Kidney DonorsArmsNephrectomy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Learning competing risks across multiple hospitals: one-shot distributed algorithms.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Data Integration in Causal Inference.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Computational statistics
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Di ShuDepartment of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7564-5186
Kazuki YoshidaDepartment of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Bruce H FiremanDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, USA.
Sengwee TohDepartment of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, USA.

Funding

Privacy-protecting distributed analysis of biomedical big dataU01EB023683 · NIBIB · HARVARD PILGRIM HEALTH CARE, INC. · PI TOH, DARREN · 2016 to 2018
$1.4M
Improving missing data analysis in distributed research networksR01HS026214 · AHRQ · HARVARD PILGRIM HEALTH CARE, INC. · PI TOH, DARREN · 2018 to 2020
$1.2M
AHRQ HHS R01 HS026214NIBIB NIH HHS U01 EB023683Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute ME-1403-11305
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The inverse probability weighted Cox proportional hazards model can be used to estimate the marginal hazard ratio. In multi-site studies, it may be infeasible to pool individual-level datasets due to privacy and other considerations. We propose three methods for making inference on hazard ratios without the need for pooling individual-level datasets across sites. The first method requires a summary-level eight-column risk-set table to produce the same hazard ratio estimate and robust sandwich variance estimate as those from the corresponding pooled individual-level data analysis (reference analysis). The second and third methods, which are based on two bootstrap re-sampling strategies, require a summary-level four-column risk-set table and bootstrap-based risk-set tables from each site to produce the same hazard ratio and bootstrap variance estimates as those from their reference analyses. All three methods require only one file transfer between the data-contributing sites and the analysis center. We justify these methods theoretically, illustrate their use, and demonstrate their statistical performance using both simulated and real-world data.

Indexed as

Data AnalysisResearch DesignProbabilityProportional Hazards ModelsCox modeldistributed data networksinverse probability weightingmulti-site studyprivacy protectionrisk set

Identifiers

PMID31448681
PMCPMC7042068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.