Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31448552›Full record

ArticleInternational wound journal2019

Histopathological, immunohistochemical, and molecular studies for determination of wound age and vitality in rats.

Azem A Khalaf, Eman I Hassanen, Amr R Zaki, Adel F Tohamy, Marwa A Ibrahim

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International wound journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. State-of-the-Art on Wound Vitality Evaluation: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Exploring New Horizons in Wound Healing: A Comprehensive Analysis.Recent advances in inflammation & allergy drug discovery · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Polymeric Nanoparticles for Wound Healing.Pharmaceutical nanotechnology · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Immunohistochemical analysis of PDGFR-α for wound age determination.International journal of legal medicine · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Azem A KhalafDepartment of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Eman I HassanenDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Amr R ZakiDepartment of Forensic Medicine and Clinical Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef, Egypt.
Adel F TohamyDepartment of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Marwa A IbrahimDepartment of Biochemistry and Chemistry of Nutrition, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7935-8379
Cairo University · EGBeni-Suef University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In forensic medicine, it is vital to verify with the best attainable accuracy once injuries occurred during vital or post-mortem conditions. An immunohistochemical study was carried out to examine the time-dependent expression of macrophage-specific gene CD68 (cluster of differentiation 68), alpha-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in different skin wound timings (0, 1, 3, 5, 7, and 14 days) in rats. Histopathological studies were performed to assess the wound age and vitality. Eighteen male albino Wister rats (weighing 170-200 g) were used for wound induction. Rats (n = 3) were euthanised at 0, 1, 3, 5, 7, and 14 days from the starting point of wound induction. Histopathological examination showed that the epidermal re-epithelialisation was completed 14 days after skin incision. The inflammatory phase was recorded during the first 3 days of healing and reached the maximum levels at 5 days, then declined after 7 days, and completely removed at 14 days. The beginning of the proliferative phase was dated to day 3 and the peak at days 5 and 7. The initiation of the granulation tissue formation and remodelling phase of the healing process was observed 5 days after wounding. By immunohistochemical staining, negative VEGF gene expressions at early stages (0-3 days) were observed, as well as neither CD68+ macrophages nor α-SMA+ myofibroblast cells were detected. By increasing the wound ages (5-7 days), granulation tissue and angiogenesis were observed, with the migration of macrophages and fibroblast, which expressed VEGF, CD68, and α-SMA positive reaction. Time-dependent expression of the above markers suggested that they would be useful indicators for the determination of wound age. Both VEGF and transforming growth factor-beta 1 (TGFb1) mRNA levels were determined in different skin wound ages. The transcription of TGFb1 and VEGF increased shortly after wounding, until post-wounding day 7. It then declined constantly, reaching minimal values on day 14.

Indexed as

Wound HealingActinsAnimalsAntigens, CDAntigens, Differentiation, MyelomonocyticCD68 MoleculeCell MovementFibroblastsGranulation TissueImmunohistochemistryMacrophagesModels, AnimalNeovascularization, PhysiologicRats, WistarRe-EpithelializationRNA, MessengerActa2 protein, ratActinsAntigens, CDAntigens, Differentiation, MyelomonocyticCD68 MoleculeCD68 protein, ratRNA, MessengerTransforming Growth Factor beta1Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Agene expressionimmunohistochemistryTGFb1VEGFwound aging

Identifiers

PMID31448552
PMCPMC7948923
OpenAlexW2971196661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.