ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2019
Probability-based 3D k-space sorting for motion robust 4D-MRI.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCurrent 4D-MRI techniques are prone to breathing-variation-induced motion artifacts. This study developed a novel method for motion-robust multi-cycle 4D-MRI using probability-based multi-cycle sorting to overcome this deficiency.
methodsThe main cycles were first extracted from the breathing signal. 3D k-space data were then sorted using a result-driven method for each main cycle. The new method was tested on a 4D-extended cardiac-torso (XCAT) phantom with a patient and an artificially generated breathing curve. For comparison, the k-space data were sorted using conventional phase sorting to generate single-cycle 4D-MRI images. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of tumor and liver, tumor volume consistency, and average intensity projection (AIP) accuracy were compared between the two methods. The original phantom images were used as references for the evaluation.
resultsThe new method showed improved tumor-to-liver SNR and tumor volume consistency as compared to 3D k-space phase sorting in both the simulated artificial and real patient breathing signals. For the artificial breathing cycles, the average tumor-to-liver SNR and standard deviation (SD) of tumor volume were 2.53 and 3.80% for cycle 1, 2.24 and 6.16% for cycle 2 of probability-based sorting as compared to 1.47 and 21.83% obtained using the phase sorting method; for the patient breathing curve, values of 1.99 and 2.71%, 1.97 and 3.29%, 1.88 and 4.16% were observed for cycle 1, cycle 2 and cycle 3 of probability-based sorting, versus 1.44 and 7.20% for phase sorting method. Furthermore, the AIP accuracy was improved in the probability-based sorting approach when compared to phase sorting, with the average intensity difference per voxel reduced from 0.39 to 0.15 for the artificial curve, and from 0.46 to 0.21 for the patient curve.
conclusionsWe demonstrated the feasibility of probability-based 3D k-space sorting for motion-robust multi-cycle 4D-MRI reconstruction with breathing variation induced motion artifact reduction compared with conventional 2D image sorting and 3D phase sorting methods. This new technique can potentially improve the accuracy of radiation treatment guidance for mobile targets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.