Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31448209›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2019

Comparison of three undersampling approaches in computed tomography reconstruction.

Chenyang Shen, Yifei Lou, Liyuan Chen, Tieyong Zeng, Michael K Ng, Lei Zhu, Xun Jia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chenyang ShenInnovative Technology of Radiotherapy Computations and Hardware (iTORCH) Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Yifei LouDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, University of Texas Dallas, Richardson, TX, USA.
Liyuan ChenInnovative Technology of Radiotherapy Computations and Hardware (iTORCH) Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Tieyong ZengDepartment of Mathematics, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Michael K NgDepartment of Mathematics, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong, China.
Lei ZhuDepartment of Modern Physics, School of Physical Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026,China.
Xun JiaInnovative Technology of Radiotherapy Computations and Hardware (iTORCH) Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.

Funding

Next generation small animal radiation research platformR37CA214639 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI JIA, XUN · 2018 to 2024
$3.8M
Precise image guidance for liver cancer stereotactic body radiotherapy using element-resolved motion-compensated cone beam CTR01CA227289 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI JIA, XUN · 2018 to 2022
$2.0M
Explore random sampling for dose reduction and scatter removal in cone beam CTR21EB021545 · NIBIB · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI JIA, XUN, ZHU, LEI · 2016 to 2017
$463k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA227289NCI NIH HHS R37 CA214639NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB021545
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProjection data undersampling is an effective approach to reduce X-ray radiation dose in computed tomography (CT). In modern CT technologies, undersampling is also a favorable method to reduce projection data size to facilitate rapid CT scan and imaging. It is an intriguing question that given an undersampling ratio, what is the optimal undersampling approach that enables the best CT image reconstruction. While this is in general a challenging mathematical question, it is the motivation of this paper to compare three types of undersampling operations, which we hope to shed some light to this question.

methodsWe considered regular view undersampling that acquires X-ray projections at equiangular projection angles, regular ray undersampling that acquires projections at all angles but with X-ray lines blocked within each projection under a periodic pattern, and random ray undersampling that acquires each X-ray line with a certain probability. By representing the undersampling projection operators under the basis of singular vectors of full projection operator, we generated matrix representations of these undersampling operators and numerically perform singular value decomposition (SVD). Singular value spectra and singular vectors were compared.

resultsFor a given undersampling ratio, the random ray undersampling approach preserves the properties of the full projection operator better than the other two approaches. This translates to advantages of reconstructing a CT image at a lower error, which has also been demonstrated in the numerical experiments.

conclusionsWe compared three undersampling strategies and found that random undersampling preserves the most information and outperforms the other two in terms of reconstruction quality.

Indexed as

Computed tomography (CT) reconstructiondose reductioniterative reconstructionsingular value decomposition (SVD)undersampling

Identifiers

PMID31448209
PMCPMC6685809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.