Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31448200›Full record

ReviewGlobal spine journal2019

Biomarkers of Ossification of the Spinal Ligament.

Yoshiharu Kawaguchi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Global spine journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Yoshiharu KawaguchiUniversity of Toyama, Toyama, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designLiterature review.

objectivesTo review biomarkers in patients with ossification of the spinal ligament (OSL), including ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament and ossification of the ligamentum flavum and to raise the present issues.

methodsA literature search was performed using PubMed and MEDLINE databases. The biomarkers were classified according to category. The number of the subjects and reproducibility were assessed.

resultsEleven articles were included in this review. There were 9 articles from Japan, 1 article from Taiwan, and 1 article from China. The biomarkers were classified into calcium-phosphate metabolism markers, bone turnover markers, sclerostin, dickkopf-1, secreted frizzled-related protein-1, fibroblast growth factor-23, fibronectin, menatetrenone, leptin, pentosidine, and hypersensitive C-reactive protein. However, there were several limitations in the research studies, such as small research field, small number of subjects, and a lack of reproducibility.

conclusionsAlthough there have been several studies that have analyzed biomarkers for OSL, there are no definitive conclusions to date. Numerous issues will need to be resolved in the future. It is imperative to continue this research because the results might prove beneficial to elucidate the pathology of OSL and the measures to prevent the initiation and progression of the disease.

Indexed as

biomarkersliterature reviewossification of the ligament flavumossification of the posterior longitudinal ligamentossification of the spinal ligament

Identifiers

PMID31448200
PMCPMC6693072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.