Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31448187›Full record

ArticleHealth and technology2019

Providers' Perspectives on Adherence to Hormonal Therapy in Breast Cancer Survivors. Is there a Role for the Digital Health Feedback System?

Alejandra Hurtado de Mendoza, Mark Cabling, Asma Dilawari, Jeanine W Turner, Nicole Fernández, Alesha Henderson, Qi Zhu, Sara Gómez, Vanessa B Sheppard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health and technology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Person-Generated Health Data in Women's Health: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Alejandra Hurtado de MendozaGeorgetown University Medical Center.
Mark CablingKing's College London.
Asma DilawariMedStar Georgetown University.
Jeanine W TurnerGeorgetown University.
Nicole FernándezGeorgetown University.
Alesha HendersonVirginia Commonwealth University.
Qi ZhuGeorgetown University Medical Center.
Sara GómezGeorgetown University Medical Center.
Vanessa B SheppardVirginia Commonwealth University.
Georgetown University · USVirginia Commonwealth University · USKing's College London · GBMedStar Georgetown University Hospital · US

Funding

Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR001432 · NCATS · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI UMANS, JASON G · 2015 to 2024
$7.5M
PREDICTORS OF ADJUVANT ENDOCRINE THERAPY ADHERENCE IN WOMEN WITH BREAST CANCERR01CA154848 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI SHEPPARD, VANESSA B · 2011 to 2015
$2.5M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001432NCI NIH HHS R01 CA154848
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDespite the benefits of hormonal therapy (HT) adherence remains suboptimal in ER positive breast cancer patients. Medication adherence is challenging to assess and tends to be overestimated. The Digital Health Feedback System (DHFS) consists of an ingestible sensor attached to a pill that sends intake date and time to a smart phone or computer. Patients can share this information with health care providers and other persons. The DHFS can also send reminders. This mixed methods study examined providers' perceptions of HT medication adherence. The potential role of the DHFS in enhancing medication tracking and adherence was also explored.

methodsWe conducted semi-structured interviews with key informants (N=10). Questions examined perceptions about adherence barriers and facilitators, challenges tracking adherence, and views on the DHFS. Findings informed the development of a survey that was administered online (N=19).

resultsProviders emphasized the importance of fostering open and trustful communication around adherence. The most mentioned challenges to assessing adherence were the patient not disclosing discontinuation immediately (78.9%) and over-reporting adherence (57.9%). The perceived potential benefits of DHFS were the ability to track adherence better (94.7%) and reminders to take the medication (68.4%). Safety to ingest a sensor was as a major perceived barrier (8 4.2%).

conclusionInterventions that target providers and doctor-patient communication are warranted to enhance adherence and reduce communication delays around HT discontinuation. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: DHFS has the potential to enhance HT adherence by directly targeting barriers. Future studies should also examine the feasibility of adopting the DHFS with cancer patients.

Indexed as

Digital Health Feedback Systemhormonal therapy adherencePatient-doctor communication

Identifiers

PMID31448187
PMCPMC6707743
OpenAlexW2895096462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.