Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31448085›Full record

ReviewF1000Research2019

Polygenic risk scores in psychiatry: Will they be useful for clinicians?

Janice M Fullerton, John I Nurnberger

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in F1000Research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Patient Perspectives on Psychiatric Polygenic Risk Scores in Reproductive Decision-Making and Polygenic Embryo Screening.American journal of medical genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics : the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Research progress and challenges of preimplantation genetic testing for polygenic diseases.Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Current State of Modeling Human Psychiatric Disorders Using Zebrafish.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  17. The Promise and Peril of Genetics.Current directions in psychological science · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Association Between Polygenic Risk Scores and Outcome of ECT.The American journal of psychiatry · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Janice M FullertonNeuroscience Research Australia, Margarete Ainsworth Building, 139 Barker Street, Randwick, Sydney, NSW, 2031, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4014-4490
John I NurnbergerDepartment of Psychiatry, Indiana University School of Medicine, 355 W. 16th Street, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7674-1767

Funding

Adolescents at High Risk for Familial Bipolar Disorder.R01MH068006 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MCINNIS, MELVIN G · 2005 to 2009
$1.4M
Adolescents at High Risk For Familial Bipolar DisorderR01MH073151 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI GLOWINSKI, ANNE L · 2005 to 2009
$1.3M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH068006NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH073151
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Major psychiatric disorders are heritable but they are genetically complex. This means that, with certain exceptions, single gene markers will not be helpful for diagnosis. However, we are learning more about the large number of gene variants that, in combination, are associated with risk for disorders such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and other psychiatric conditions. The presence of those risk variants may now be combined into a polygenic risk score (PRS). Such a score provides a quantitative index of the genomic burden of risk variants in an individual, which relates to the likelihood that a person has a particular disorder. Currently, such scores are quite useful in research, and they are telling us much about the relationships between different disorders and other indices of brain function. In the future, as the datasets supporting the development of such scores become larger and more diverse and as methodological developments improve predictive capacity, we expect that PRS will have substantial clinical utility in the assessment of risk for disease, subtypes of disease, and even treatment response. Here, we provide an overview of PRS in general terms (including a glossary suitable for informed non-geneticists) and discuss the use of PRS in psychiatry, including their limitations and cautions for interpretation, as well as their applications now and in the future.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseMultifactorial InheritanceBipolar DisorderHumansMental DisordersPsychiatrySchizophreniaclinical practicegeneticspolygenic risk scorespsychiatry

Identifiers

PMID31448085
PMCPMC6676506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.