Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31448028›Full record

ArticleThe Pan African medical journal2019

[Maternal and fetal outcomes of unattended pregnancies in Lubumbashi, Democratic Republic of Congo].

Amani Maleya, Yves Kalume Kakudji, Roger Munan Mwazaz, Joseph Bulenda Nsambi, Hugues Ilunga Ngwej, Olivier Mukuku, Xavier Kinenkinda, Prosper Kakudji Luhete

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Pan African medical journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Amani MaleyaDépartement de Gynécologie-Obstétrique, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Lubumbashi, République Démocratique du Congo.
Yves Kalume KakudjiDépartement de Gynécologie-Obstétrique, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Lubumbashi, République Démocratique du Congo.
Roger Munan MwazazDépartement de Gynécologie-Obstétrique, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Lubumbashi, République Démocratique du Congo.
Joseph Bulenda NsambiDépartement de Gynécologie-Obstétrique, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Lubumbashi, République Démocratique du Congo.
Hugues Ilunga NgwejDépartement de Gynécologie-Obstétrique, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Lubumbashi, République Démocratique du Congo.
Olivier MukukuInstitut Supérieur des Techniques Médicales de Lubumbashi, République Démocratique du Congo.
Xavier KinenkindaDépartement de Gynécologie-Obstétrique, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Lubumbashi, République Démocratique du Congo.
Prosper Kakudji LuheteDépartement de Gynécologie-Obstétrique, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Lubumbashi, République Démocratique du Congo.
University of Lubumbashi · CDInstitut Supérieur de Technique Médicale · CD

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionUnattended pregnancies are characterized by significant morbidity maternal and morbidity and mortality fetal. This study aims to determine the frequency of unattended pregnancies, to describe the socio-demographic profile and to assess the maternal and fetal outcomes during childbirth among women who did not attend antenatal care (ANC) in the city of Lubumbashi.

methodsIt was an analytical cross-sectional study of maternal pregnancy from December 2013 to May 2014 in 10 maternity hospitals in Lubumbashi. Women who did not receive ANC were compared to women who had followed them (ANC≥4). Maternal socio-demographic parameters, maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality were analyzed.

resultsWe found that the frequency of no pregnancy monitoring was 21.23% and the mean number of antenatal visits was 2.6 ± 1.9. An analysis of the relationship between ANC and socio-demographic characteristics of women who were delivered shows that the lack of follow-up was 2.29 times higher for adolescent girls than for adult women (OR=2.29 [1.54-3.41]), 4 times higher for women living alone than for women living in unions (OR=4.00 [2.05-7.79]) and 4.08 times higher for women with low levels of education (illiterate or primary) than among those with a high level of education (OR=4.08 [3.08-5.40]). Compared to those who followed them well, we did not find that women who did not attend ANC had a high risk of obstetric emergency (OR = 1.90 [1.26-2.95]), rupture of membranes fetal admission (OR=1.31 [1.02-1.68]), fetal mal presentation (OR=1.89 [1.03-3.44]), caesarean delivery (OR=1.78 [1.21-2.63]), eclampsia (OR=3.00 [1.09-8.70]), uterine rupture (OR=4.76 [1.00-47.19]) and anemia (OR=2.33 [1.06-5.13]). Rates of preterm birth (OR = 1.93 [1.33-2.80]), post-maturity (OR=1.47 [1.00-2.30]), low birth weight (OR=2.33 [1.56-3.46]), neonatal depression (OR=3.89 [2.52-6.02]), neonatal transfer (OR=1.60 [1.11-2.32]) and perinatal mortality (OR=2.70 [1.59-4.57]) were significantly higher in neonates from women with prenatal consultations than in those with well followed.

conclusionOur study shows that the lack of follow-up of ANC is associated with high maternal morbidity and high perinatal morbidity and mortality in our environment.

Indexed as

Pregnancy OutcomeAdolescentAdultAge FactorsCesarean SectionCross-Sectional StudiesDelivery, ObstetricDemocratic Republic of the CongoEducational StatusFemaleHospitals, MaternityHumansInfant, NewbornPerinatal MortalityPregnancyPregnancy Complicationsantenatal careLubumbashimaternal and perinatal outcomesPregnancy not followed

Identifiers

PMID31448028
PMCPMC6689857
OpenAlexW2947908498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.