ArticleJournal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry = Journal de l'Academie canadienne de psychiatrie de l'enfant et de l'adolescent2019
Evaluation of the Referral Process and Patterns to a Canadian Specialized Eating Disorders Treatment Program.
Article in Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry = Journal de l'Academie canadienne de psychiatrie de l'enfant et de l'adolescent, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Supporting Individuals on Eating Disorder Waitlists Through App-Based Motivational Interviewing: A Qualitative Evaluation of a Program-Led Pilot Intervention.The International journal of eating disorders · 2026Article
- Barriers to Mental Health care in Canada Identified by Healthcare Providers: A Scoping Review.Administration and policy in mental health · 2024Article
- Models of care for eating disorders: findings from a rapid review.Journal of eating disorders · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo describe the referral process and patterns to the Calgary Eating Disorders Program (CEDP).
methodA retrospective chart review for the study period of May 2014 to May 2016 was completed and a descriptive evaluation of the referral process was outlined.
resultsThe results summarize the steps in the referral process from initiation of referral to booking an assessment. The CEDP received 918 referrals during the study period, yet 60% did not materialize into a patient assessment. Regardless of age, the two most common reasons were patients declined treatment and did not meet program criteria. Physicians who refer to the CEDP are mostly female, family physician specialty and from Calgary. Patients referred to the CEDP are predominantly females, have an average age of 25 years and are mainly referred for 'eating disorder symptoms-diagnosis unclear', regardless of age. The majority of patients are not severely ill at the time of referral. More than 50% of patients have psychiatric comorbidities, with depression, anxiety and substance abuse being the most common. The average wait times to the CEDP are 12 weeks.
conclusionsThis is the first study in Canada to assess referral patterns to a specialized eating disorders program. Results from this study have elucidated the reasons for referral fall-through and highlighted areas of improvement in the referral process. Understanding referral trends is a necessary foundation to advance our knowledge of the factors that contribute to referrals materializing into assessments and ultimately optimizing patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31447903PMC6691796What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.