Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31447889›Full record

ArticleJournal of geriatric cardiology : JGC2019

The utility of coronary computed tomography angiography in elderly patients.

Jordan Laggoune, Nitesh Nerlekar, Kiran Munnur, Brian Sh Ko, James D Cameron, Sujith Seneviratne, Dennis Tl Wong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Chronic Coronary Disease in Older Adults.The Medical clinics of North America · 2024
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jordan LaggouneMonash Cardiovascular Research Centre, Monash University and MonashHeart, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Nitesh NerlekarMonash Cardiovascular Research Centre, Monash University and MonashHeart, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Kiran MunnurMonash Cardiovascular Research Centre, Monash University and MonashHeart, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Brian Sh KoMonash Cardiovascular Research Centre, Monash University and MonashHeart, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
James D CameronMonash Cardiovascular Research Centre, Monash University and MonashHeart, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Sujith SeneviratneMonash Cardiovascular Research Centre, Monash University and MonashHeart, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Dennis Tl WongMonash Cardiovascular Research Centre, Monash University and MonashHeart, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Monash University · AUMonash Health · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCoronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is often avoided in elderly patients due to a presumption that a high proportion of patients will have heavily calcified plaque limiting an accurate assessment. We sought to assess the image quality, luminal stenosis and utility of CCTA in elderly patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) and stable chest pain.

methodsRetrospective analysis of elderly patients (> 75 years) who underwent 320-detector row CCTA between 2012-2017 at MonashHeart. The CCTA was analysed for degree maximal coronary stenosis by CAD-RADS classification, image quality by a 5-point Likert score (1-poor, 2-adequate, 3-good, 4-very good, 5-excellent) and presence of artefact limiting interpretability.

results1011 elderly patients (62% females, 78.8 ± 3.3 years) were studied. Cardiovascular risk factor prevalence included: hypertension (65%), hyperlipidaemia (48%), diabetes (19%) and smoking (21%). The CCTA was evaluable in 68% of patients which included 52% with non-obstructive CAD (< 50% stenosis), 48% with obstructive CAD (> 50%) stenosis. Mean Likert score was 3.1 ± 0.6 corresponding to good image quality. Of the 323 (32%) of patients with a non-interpretable CCTA, 80% were due to calcified plaque and 20% due to motion artefact. Male gender (

conclusionAlthough CCTA is a feasible non-invasive tool for assessment of elderly patients with stable chest pain, clinicians should still be cautious about referring elderly patients for CCTA. Patients who are male, diabetic and >78 years of age are significantly less likely to have interpretable scans.

Indexed as

Coronary artery calciumCoronary CT angiographyMulti-detector row CTThe elderly

Identifiers

PMID31447889
PMCPMC6689518
OpenAlexW2966815933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.