Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31447829›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2019

Dynamics and Differences in Systemic and Local Immune Responses After Vaccination With Inactivated and Live Commercial Vaccines and Subsequent Subclinical Infection With PRRS Virus.

Miroslav Toman, Vladimir Celer, Lenka Kavanová, Lenka Levá, Jitka Frolichova, Petra Ondráčková, Hana Kudláčková, Kateřina Nechvátalová, Jiri Salat, Martin Faldyna

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Miroslav TomanDepartment of Immunology, Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czechia.
Vladimir CelerFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Brno, Czechia.
Lenka KavanováDepartment of Immunology, Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czechia.
Lenka LeváDepartment of Immunology, Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czechia.
Jitka FrolichovaFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Brno, Czechia.
Petra OndráčkováDepartment of Immunology, Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czechia.
Hana KudláčkováDepartment of Immunology, Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czechia.
Kateřina NechvátalováDepartment of Immunology, Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czechia.
Jiri SalatDepartment of Virology, Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czechia.
Martin FaldynaDepartment of Immunology, Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czechia.
Veterinary Research Institute · CZUniversity of Veterinary Sciences Brno · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goals of our study were to compare the immune response to different killed and modified live vaccines against PRRS virus and to monitor the antibody production and the cell mediated immunity both at the systemic and local level. In the experiment, we immunized four groups of piglets with two commercial inactivated (A1-Progressis, A2-Suivac) and two modified live vaccines (B3-Amervac, B4-Porcilis). Twenty-one days after the final vaccination, all piglets, including the control non-immunized group (C5), were i.n., infected with the Lelystad strain of PRRS virus. The serum antibody response (IgM and IgG) was the strongest in group A1 followed by two MLV (B3 and B4) groups. Locally, we demonstrated the highest level of IgG antibodies in bronchoalveolar lavages (BALF), and saliva in group A1, whereas low IgA antibody responses in BALF and feces were detected in all groups. We have found virus neutralization antibody at DPV 21 (days post vaccination) and higher levels in all groups including the control at DPI 21 (days post infection). Positive antigen specific cell-mediated response in lymphocyte transformation test (LTT) was observed in groups B3 and B4 at DPV 7 and in group B4 at DPV 21 and in all intervals after infection. The IFN-γ producing lymphocytes after antigen stimulation were found in CD4

Indexed as

Lymphocyte ActivationVaccinationAnimalsAntibodies, ViralPorcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome virusSwineVaccines, InactivatedVaccines, Live, UnattenuatedViral LoadViral VaccinesAntibodies, ViralVaccines, InactivatedVaccines, Live, UnattenuatedViral Vaccinesantibodycell-mediated immunityinactive vaccinemodified-live vaccineporcine reproductive and respiratory syndromevirus

Identifiers

PMID31447829
PMCPMC6691355
OpenAlexW2955578920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.