Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31447668›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2019

Global Text Mining and Development of Pharmacogenomic Knowledge Resource for Precision Medicine.

Debleena Guin, Jyoti Rani, Priyanka Singh, Sandeep Grover, Shivangi Bora, Puneet Talwar, Muthusamy Karthikeyan, K Satyamoorthy, C Adithan, S Ramachandran and 3 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Debleena GuinGenomics and Molecular Medicine Unit, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR)-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology (IGIB), New Delhi, India.
Jyoti RaniDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Acharya Narayan Dev College, University of Delhi, New Delhi, India.
Priyanka SinghGenomics and Molecular Medicine Unit, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR)-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology (IGIB), New Delhi, India.
Sandeep GroverInstitute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, University of Lübeck University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein - Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Shivangi BoraGenomics and Molecular Medicine Unit, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR)-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology (IGIB), New Delhi, India.
Puneet TalwarInstitute of Human Behaviour and Allied Sciences, Delhi, India.
Muthusamy KarthikeyanDepartment of Bioinformatics, Alagappa University, Karaikudi, India.
K SatyamoorthySchool of Life Sciences, Manipal University, Manipal, India.
C AdithanCentral Inter-Disciplinary Research Facility (CIDRF), Pondicherry, India.
S RamachandranG N Ramachandran Knowledge Centre, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR)-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology (IGIB), New Delhi, India.
Luciano SasoDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology "Vittorio Erspamer," Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Yasha HasijaDepartment of Biotechnology, Delhi Technological University, Delhi, India.
Ritushree KukretiGenomics and Molecular Medicine Unit, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR)-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology (IGIB), New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding patients' genomic variations and their effect in protecting or predisposing them to drug response phenotypes is important for providing personalized healthcare. Several studies have manually curated such genotype-phenotype relationships into organized databases from clinical trial data or published literature. However, there are no text mining tools available to extract high-accuracy information from such existing knowledge. In this work, we used a semiautomated text mining approach to retrieve a complete pharmacogenomic (PGx) resource integrating disease-drug-gene-polymorphism relationships to derive a global perspective for ease in therapeutic approaches. We used an R package, pubmed.mineR, to automatically retrieve PGx-related literature. We identified 1,753 disease types, and 666 drugs, associated with 4,132 genes and 33,942 polymorphisms collated from 180,088 publications. With further manual curation, we obtained a total of 2,304 PGx relationships. We evaluated our approach by performance (precision = 0.806) with benchmark datasets like Pharmacogenomic Knowledgebase (PharmGKB) (0.904), Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM) (0.600), and The Comparative Toxicogenomics Database (CTD) (0.729). We validated our study by comparing our results with 362 commercially used the US- Food and drug administration (FDA)-approved drug labeling biomarkers. Of the 2,304 PGx relationships identified, 127 belonged to the FDA list of 362 approved pharmacogenomic markers, indicating that our semiautomated text mining approach may reveal significant PGx information with markers for drug response prediction. In addition, it is a scalable and state-of-art approach in curation for PGx clinical utility.

Indexed as

disease–drug–gene–mutation relationshippharmacogenomic knowledgebasepharmacogenomic markersprecision medicinetext mining

Identifiers

PMID31447668
PMCPMC6692532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.