Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31447601›Full record

ArticleVisual cognition2018

Dichotomous Perception of Animal Categories in Infancy.

Hannah White, Rachel Jubran, Alyson Chroust, Alison Heck, Ramesh S Bhatt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Visual cognition, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hannah WhiteDepartment of Psychology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506-0044, hannah.white@uky.edu.
Rachel JubranDepartment of Psychology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506-0044, rachel.jubran@uky.edu.
Alyson ChroustDepartment of Psychology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506-0044, chroust@mail.etsu.edu.
Alison HeckDepartment of Psychology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506-0044, a.heck22@uky.edu.
Ramesh S BhattDepartment of Psychology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506-0044, rbhatt@email.uky.edu.

Funding

The development of emotion processing in infancyR01HD075829 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI BHATT, RAMESH S · 2015 to 2019
$1.5M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD075829
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although there is a wealth of knowledge on categorization early in life, there are still many unanswered questions about the nature of category representation in infancy. For example, it is unclear whether infants are sensitive to boundaries between complex categories, such as types of animals, or whether young infants exhibit such sensitivity without explicit experience in the lab. Using a morphing technique, we linearly altered the category composition of images and measured 6.5-month-olds' attention to pairs of animal faces that either did or did not cross the categorical boundary, with the stimuli in each pair being equally dissimilar from one another across the two types of image pairs. Results indicated that infants dichotomize the continua between cats and dogs and between cows and otters, but only when the images are presented in their canonical, upright orientations. These findings demonstrate a propensity to dichotomize early in life that could have implications for social categorizations, such as race and gender.

Indexed as

animal knowledge in infancycategorical perceptiondichotomization in infancyearly conceptual development

Identifiers

PMID31447601
PMCPMC6707735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.