Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31447558›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nanomedicine2019

SERS-based differential diagnosis between multiple solid malignancies: breast, colorectal, lung, ovarian and oral cancer.

Vlad Moisoiu, Andrei Stefancu, Diana Gulei, Radu Boitor, Lorand Magdo, Lajos Raduly, Sergiu Pasca, Paul Kubelac, Nikolay Mehterov, Vasile Chiș and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nanomedicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Vlad Moisoiu *Faculty of Physics, Babeș-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Andrei Stefancu *Faculty of Physics, Babeș-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Diana Gulei *MedFuture - Research Center for Advanced Medicine, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Radu BoitorSchool of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Lorand MagdoFaculty of Medicine, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Lajos RadulyResearch Center for Functional Genomics, Biomedicine and Translational Medicine, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Sergiu PascaFaculty of Medicine, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Paul KubelacFaculty of Medicine, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Nikolay MehterovDepartment of Medical Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University-Plovdiv, Plovdiv, Bulgaria.
Vasile ChișFaculty of Physics, Babeș-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Marioara SimonDepartment of Bronchology, Leon Daniello Pneumophysiology Clinical Hospital, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Mihai MuresanFaculty of Medicine, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Alexandra Iulia IrimieDepartment of Prosthetic Dentistry and Dental Materials, Division Dental Propaedeutics, Aesthetics, Faculty of Dentistry, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Mihaela BaciutDepartment of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery and Dental Emergencies, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Rares StiufiucMedFuture - Research Center for Advanced Medicine, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Ioana E PavelMedFuture - Research Center for Advanced Medicine, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Patriciu Achimas-CadariuDepartment of Surgery, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Calin IonescuFaculty of Medicine, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Vladimir LazarWorldwide Innovative Network for Personalized Cancer Therapy, Villejuif, France.
Victoria SarafianDepartment of Medical Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University-Plovdiv, Plovdiv, Bulgaria.
Ioan NotingherSchool of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Nicolae LeopoldFaculty of Physics, Babeș-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Ioana Berindan-NeagoeMedFuture - Research Center for Advanced Medicine, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSurface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) spectroscopy on serum and other biofluids for cancer diagnosis represents an emerging field, which has shown promising preliminary results in several types of malignancies. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate that SERS spectroscopy on serum can be employed for the differential diagnosis between five of the leading malignancies, ie, breast, colorectal, lung, ovarian and oral cancer. PATIENTS AND

methodsSerum samples were acquired from healthy volunteers (n=39) and from patients diagnosed with breast (n=42), colorectal (n=109), lung (n=33), oral (n=17), and ovarian cancer (n=13), comprising n=253 samples in total. SERS spectra were acquired using a 532 nm laser line as excitation source, while the SERS substrates were represented by Ag nanoparticles synthesized by reduction with hydroxylamine. The classification accuracy yielded by SERS was assessed by principal component analysis-linear discriminant analysis (PCA-LDA).

resultsThe sensitivity and specificity in discriminating between cancer patients and controls was 98% and 91%, respectively. Cancer samples were correctly assigned to their corresponding cancer types with an accuracy of 88% for oral cancer, 86% for colorectal cancer, 80% for ovarian cancer, 76% for breast cancer and 59% for lung cancer.

conclusionSERS on serum represents a promising strategy of diagnosing cancer which can discriminate between cancer patients and controls, as well as between cancer types such as breast, colorectal, lung ovarian and oral cancer.

Indexed as

AgedBreast NeoplasmsCase-Control StudiesColorectal NeoplasmsDiagnosis, DifferentialDiscriminant AnalysisFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMetal NanoparticlesMiddle AgedMouth NeoplasmsNeoplasmsOvarian NeoplasmsPrincipal Component AnalysisSilverprincipal component analysis-linear discriminant analysisSERSserumsolid malignanciessurface-enhanced Raman scattering

Identifiers

PMID31447558
PMCPMC6684856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.