Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31447544›Full record

ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2019

Loteprednol etabonate (submicron) ophthalmic gel 0.38% dosed three times daily following cataract surgery: integrated analysis of two Phase III clinical studies.

Raymond Fong, Megan E Cavet, Heleen H DeCory, Jason L Vittitow

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05542381 (The Role of Loteprednol in Reducing Post-Intravitreal Injection Related Pain), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05542381 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

The Role of Loteprednol in Reducing Post-Intravitreal Injection Related Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityRan2022 to 2025Enrolled64ConditionsAge-Related Macular DegenerationArmsLoteprednol Etabonate Ophthalmic Gel [Lotemax], Refresh Lubricant Eye Drops [Artificial Tears]
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Available Therapeutic Options for Corneal Neovascularization: A Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Raymond FongManhattan Eye, Ear and Throat Hospital and Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
Megan E CavetMedical Affairs, Bausch + Lomb, Rochester, NY, USA.
Heleen H DeCoryMedical Affairs, Bausch + Lomb, Rochester, NY, USA.
Jason L VittitowClinical Affairs, Bausch + Lomb, Bridgewater, NJ, USA.
Bausch Health (United States) · USLenox Hill Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of a submicron formulation of loteprednol etabonate (LE) gel 0.38% instilled three times daily (TID) compared with vehicle for the treatment of inflammation and pain following cataract surgery with intraocular lens implantation, integrated across two multicenter, double-masked, randomized, parallel-group, Phase III studies. PATIENTS AND

methodsSubjects ≥18 years of age with anterior chamber (AC) cells ≥grade 2 (6-15 cells) on day 1 after cataract surgery were randomized to receive 1 drop of LE gel 0.38% TID, twice daily (not reported/analyzed herein), or vehicle instilled in the study eye for 14 days. Primary endpoints were the proportion of subjects with resolution of AC cells and grade 0 (no) pain at postoperative day 8. Safety outcomes included adverse events (AEs), ocular signs, fundoscopy results, visual acuity, intraocular pressure (IOP), and tolerability (drop comfort and ocular symptoms).

resultsThe integrated intent-to-treat population included 742 subjects (LE gel 0.38% TID, n=371; vehicle, n=371). Significantly more subjects in the LE gel 0.38% TID group compared with the vehicle group had complete resolution of AC cells (29.6% vs 15.1%) and grade 0 pain (74.4% vs 48.8%) at day 8 (

conclusionThe results of this integrated analysis indicate that LE (submicron) gel 0.38% administered TID is safe and effective for the treatment of ocular inflammation and pain following cataract surgery, with minimal risk of IOP elevation.

Indexed as

cataract surgeryintegrated analysisloteprednol etabonatepostoperative inflammationpostoperative painsubmicron

Identifiers

PMID31447544
PMCPMC6683659
OpenAlexW2966366643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.