ArticleJournal of the American Statistical Association2019
Functional Data Analysis of Dynamic PET Data.
Article in Journal of the American Statistical Association, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Parametric imaging of dynamic long-axial-field-of-view PET scans: Technical challenges, statistical insights and clinical applications.Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2026Review
- OMNI: Gas Chromatograph Captures Seven Common PET Radiotracer Analytes in under 5 Minutes.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Quantitation of dynamic total-body PET imaging: recent developments and future perspectives.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023Review
- Statistical Learning Methods for Neuroimaging Data Analysis with Applications.Annual review of biomedical data science · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
One application of positron emission tomography (PET), a nuclear imaging technique, in neuroscience involves in vivo estimation of the density of various proteins (often, neuroreceptors) in the brain. PET scanning begins with the injection of a radiolabeled tracer that binds preferentially to the target protein; tracer molecules are then continuously delivered to the brain via the bloodstream. By detecting the radioactive decay of the tracer over time, dynamic PET data are constructed to reflect the concentration of the target protein in the brain at each time. The fundamental problem in the analysis of dynamic PET data involves estimating the impulse response function (IRF), which is necessary for describing the binding behavior of the injected radiotracer. Virtually all existing methods have three common aspects: summarizing the entire IRF with a single scalar measure; modeling each subject separately; and the imposition of parametric restrictions on the IRF. In contrast, we propose a functional data analytic approach that regards each subject's IRF as the basic analysis unit, models multiple subjects simultaneously, and estimates the IRF nonparametrically. We pose our model as a linear mixed effect model in which population level fixed effects and subject-specific random effects are expanded using a
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.