Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31447329›Full record

ArticleBiological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging2020

Toward Robust Anxiety Biomarkers: A Machine Learning Approach in a Large-Scale Sample.

Emily A Boeke, Avram J Holmes, Elizabeth A Phelps

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Metagenomics reveals unique gut mycobiome biomarkers in psoriasis.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Individualized functional connectome identified generalizable biomarkers for psychiatric symptoms in transdiagnostic patients.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Machine learning to advance the prediction, prevention and treatment of eating disorders.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Emily A BoekeDepartment of Psychology, New York University, New York, New York.
Avram J HolmesDepartment of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut; Department of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
Elizabeth A PhelpsDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge Massachusetts. Electronic address: phelps@fas.harvard.edu.

Funding

Stress, Arousal and Mood: Affective Influences on Decisions under UncertaintyR01DA042855 · NIDA · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI PHELPS, ELIZABETH ANYA · 2017 to 2021
$2.6M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA042855
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe field of psychiatry has long sought biomarkers that can objectively diagnose patients, predict treatment response, or identify individuals at risk of illness onset. However, reliable psychiatric biomarkers have yet to emerge. The recent application of machine learning techniques to develop neuroimaging-based biomarkers has yielded promising preliminary results. However, much of the work in this domain has not met best practice standards from the field of machine learning. This is especially true for studies of anxiety, creating uncertainty about the potential for anxiety biomarker development.

methodsWe applied machine learning tools to predict trait anxiety from neuroimaging measurements in humans. Using publicly available data from the Brain Genomics Superstruct Project, we compared a suite of neuroimaging-based machine learning models predicting anxiety within a discovery sample (n = 531, 307 women) via k-fold cross-validation, and we tested the final model (a stacked model incorporating region-to-region functional connectivity, amygdala seed-to-voxel connectivity, and volumetric and cortical thickness data) in a held-out, unseen test sample (n = 348, 209 women).

resultsThough the best model was able to predict anxiety within the discovery sample (cross-validated R

conclusionsIn this study, we did not find evidence of a generalizable anxiety biomarker. However, we encourage other researchers to investigate this topic, utilizing large samples and proper methodology, to clarify the potential of neuroimaging-based anxiety biomarkers.

Indexed as

Machine LearningNeuroimagingAnxietyBiomarkersBrainFemaleHumansBiomarkersAnxietyBiomarkerfMRIFunctional connectivityMachine learningPredictive modeling

Identifiers

PMID31447329
PMCPMC6925354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.