ArticleBiophysical journal2019
Characterizing Conduction Channels in Postinfarction Patients Using a Personalized Virtual Heart.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- An eikonal model with re-excitability for fast simulations in cardiac electrophysiology.The Journal of physiology · 2026Article
- The Hodgkin-Huxley-Katz Prize Lecture: Heart digital twins: A new paradigm in arrhythmia medicine.The Journal of physiology · 2026Article
- Genotype-specific digital twins for arrhythmia ablation targeting in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy.Communications medicine · 2026Article
- Genotype-specific Digital Twins for Arrhythmia Ablation Targeting in Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy.Research square · 2025Article
- Reply to: Stochastic virtual heart model predictions.Nature cardiovascular research · 2025Article
- Computational Medicine: What Electrophysiologists Should Know to Stay Ahead of the Curve.Current cardiology reports · 2024Review
- Computational modeling of cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmogenesis: toward clinical translation.Physiological reviews · 2024Review
- Studying the Influence of Finite Element Mesh Size on the Accuracy of Ventricular Tachycardia Simulation.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
- Article
- How to use pace mapping for ventricular tachycardia ablation in postinfarct patients.Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology · 2022Review
- An automated near-real time computational method for induction and treatment of scar-related ventricular tachycardias.Medical image analysis · 2022Article
- Simulated late gadolinium enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging dataset from mechanical XCAT phantom including a myocardial infarct.Data in brief · 2022Article
- Whole-heart ventricular arrhythmia modeling moving forward: Mechanistic insights and translational applications.Biophysics reviews · 2021Article
- Impact of augmented-reality improvement in ablation catheter navigation as assessed by virtual-heart simulations of ventricular tachycardia ablation.Computers in biology and medicine · 2021Article
- Fully Automatic Scar Segmentation for Late Gadolinium Enhancement MRI Images in Left Ventricle with Myocardial Infarction.Current medical science · 2021Article
- Preliminary Study: Learning the Impact of Simulation Time on Reentry Location and Morphology Induced by Personalized Cardiac Modeling.Frontiers in physiology · 2021Article
- How personalized heart modeling can help treatment of lethal arrhythmias: A focus on ventricular tachycardia ablation strategies in post-infarction patients.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine · 2020Review
- The Heart by Numbers.Biophysical journal · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Patients with myocardial infarction have an abundance of conduction channels (CC); however, only a small subset of these CCs sustain ventricular tachycardia (VT). Identifying these critical CCs (CCCs) in the clinic so that they can be targeted by ablation remains a significant challenge. The objective of this study is to use a personalized virtual-heart approach to conduct a three-dimensional (3D) assessment of CCCs sustaining VTs of different morphologies in these patients, to investigate their 3D structural features, and to determine the optimal ablation strategy for each VT. To achieve these goals, ventricular models were constructed from contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imagings of six postinfarction patients. Rapid pacing induced VTs in each model. CCCs that sustained different VT morphologies were identified. CCCs' 3D structure and type and the resulting rotational electrical activity were examined. Ablation was performed at the optimal part of each CCC, aiming to terminate each VT with a minimal lesion size. Predicted ablation locations were compared to clinical. Analyzing the simulation results, we found that the observed VTs in each patient model were sustained by a limited number (2.7 ± 1.2) of CCCs. Further, we identified three types of CCCs sustaining VTs: I-type and T-type channels, with all channel branches bounded by scar, and functional reentry channels, which were fully or partially bounded by conduction block surfaces. The different types of CCCs accounted for 43.8, 18.8, and 37.4% of all CCCs, respectively. The mean narrowest width of CCCs or a branch of CCC was 9.7 ± 3.6 mm. Ablation of the narrowest part of each CCC was sufficient to terminate VT. Our results demonstrate that a personalized virtual-heart approach can determine the possible VT morphologies in each patient and identify the CCCs that sustain reentry. The approach can aid clinicians in identifying accurately the optimal VT ablation targets in postinfarction patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.