Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31446521›Full record

SynthesisClinical & experimental metastasis2019

Ureteral involvement by metastatic malignant disease.

Jieping Hu, Jun Deng, Ju Guo, Bin Fu

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical & experimental metastasis, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. A Darwinian Perspective on Tumor Evolution.International journal of biological sciences · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jieping HuDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, 17 Yongwai Zheng Street, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, China. hu_jieping@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5136-2958
Jun DengDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, 17 Yongwai Zheng Street, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, China.
Ju GuoDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, 17 Yongwai Zheng Street, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, China.
Bin FuDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, 17 Yongwai Zheng Street, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, China. 792586870@qq.com.
Nanchang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ureteral metastases from other primary cancers are very rare. Treatment of these metastases is difficult and outcomes are poor. A thorough literature review was done with the aim of finding characteristics that may influence survival rates of patients with ureteral metastases. Systematic literature searches of PubMed and Web of Science were performed in Jan 2019. A total of 79 papers that included 265 patients with cancer metastases to their ureters were finally considered for evidence synthesis. Prostate, bladder, breast, gut cancer and lymphoma were the predominant primary tumors. The median interval time from primary tumor diagnosis to ureter metastasis was 28.5 months. The median survival time after diagnosis of ureter metastasis was 18 months. Risk factors of survival were analyzed. Age, sex, hydronephrosis, ureter side, and segment were not associated with survival. Interval time and treatment were associated with overall survival. Further analysis indicated that patients who underwent surgery had better outcomes.

Indexed as

AgedFemaleHumansMaleNeoplasmsPrognosisSurvival RateUrethral NeoplasmsHydronephrosisMalignantSurgerySurvivalUreter metastases

Identifiers

PMID31446521
OpenAlexW2969635034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.