ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2019
Accelerating cardiovascular model building with convolutional neural networks.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- HeartSimSage: Attention-Enhanced Graph Neural Networks for Accelerating Cardiac Mechanics Modeling.Journal of computational physics · 2026Article
- Rapid prediction of cardiac activation in the left ventricle with geometric deep learning: a step towards cardiac resynchronization therapy planning.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Differential effects of demographics and risk factors on the nonlinear orthotropic mechanical properties of human femoropopliteal arteries.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2025Article
- DIRECT MEDICAL IMAGE TO SIMULATION USING AUTO-SEGMENTATION AND POINT CLOUD-BASED CFD.Advances in computational science and engineering · 2025Article
- Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Imaging for Personalized Management of Coronary Artery Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- SeqSeg: Learning Local Segments for Automatic Vascular Model Construction.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- Rapid estimation of left ventricular contractility with a physics-informed neural network inverse modeling approach.Artificial intelligence in medicine · 2024Article
- Learning reduced-order models for cardiovascular simulations with graph neural networks.Computers in biology and medicine · 2024Article
- The Potential of Deep Learning to Advance Clinical Applications of Computational Biomechanics.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Beyond CFD: Emerging methodologies for predictive simulation in cardiovascular health and disease.Biophysics reviews · 2023Review
- svMorph: Interactive Geometry-Editing Tools for Virtual Patient-Specific Vascular Anatomies.Journal of biomechanical engineering · 2023Article
- A deep-learning approach for direct whole-heart mesh reconstruction.Medical image analysis · 2021Article
- Deep Learning-Based Available and Common Clinical-Related Feature Variables Robustly Predict Survival in Community-Acquired Pneumonia.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2021Article
- Heart Valve Biomechanics: The Frontiers of Modeling Modalities and the Expansive Capabilities ofFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Review
- Physiology and coronary artery disease: emerging insights from computed tomography imaging based computational modeling.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2020Review
- Image-based scaling laws for somatic growth and pulmonary artery morphometry from infancy to adulthood.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2020Article
- Applications and Challenges of Machine Learning to Enable Realistic Cellular Simulations.Frontiers in physics · 2020Article
- Computational Hemodynamic Modeling of Arterial Aneurysms: A Mini-Review.Frontiers in physiology · 2020Review
- A Deep Learning Framework for Design and Analysis of Surgical Bioprosthetic Heart Valves.Scientific reports · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The objective of this work is to reduce the user effort required for 2D segmentation when building patient-specific cardiovascular models using the SimVascular cardiovascular modeling software package. The proposed method uses a fully convolutional neural network (FCNN) to generate 2D cardiovascular segmentations. Given vessel pathlines, the neural network generates 2D vessel enhancement images along the pathlines. Thereafter, vessel segmentations are extracted using the marching-squares algorithm, which are then used to construct 3D cardiovascular models. The neural network is trained using a novel loss function, tailored for partially labeled segmentation data. An automated quality control method is also developed, allowing promising segmentations to be selected. Compared with a threshold and level set algorithm, the FCNN method improved 2D segmentation accuracy across several metrics. The proposed quality control approach further improved the average DICE score by 25.8%. In tests with users of SimVascular, when using quality control, users accepted 80% of segmentations produced by the best performing FCNN. The FCNN cardiovascular model building method reduces the amount of manual segmentation effort required for patient-specific model construction, by as much as 73%. This leads to reduced turnaround time for cardiovascular simulations. While the method was used for cardiovascular model building, it is applicable to general tubular structures. Graphical Abstract Proposed FCNN-based cardiovascular model building pipeline. a.) Image data and vessel pathline supplied by the user. b.) Path information is used to extract image pixel intensities in plane perpendicular to the vessel path. c.) 2D images extracted along vessel pathlines are input to the FCNN. d.) FCNN acts on the input images to compute local vessel enhancement images. e.) Vessel enhancement images computed by the FCNN, the pixel values are between 0 and 1 indicating vessel tissue likelihood. f.) The marching-squares algorithm is appliedto each enhanced image to extract the central vessel segmentation. g.) 2D extracted vessel surface points overlayed on original input images. h.) The 2D vessel surface points are transformed back to 3D space. i.) 3D crosssectional vessel surfaces are interpolated along the pathline to form the final vessel model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.