Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31446517›Full record

ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2019

Accelerating cardiovascular model building with convolutional neural networks.

Gabriel Maher, Nathan Wilson, Alison Marsden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. DIRECT MEDICAL IMAGE TO SIMULATION USING AUTO-SEGMENTATION AND POINT CLOUD-BASED CFD.Advances in computational science and engineering · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Image-based scaling laws for somatic growth and pulmonary artery morphometry from infancy to adulthood.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gabriel MaherInstitute for Computational and Mathematical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. gdmaher@stanford.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9338-4709
Nathan WilsonOpen Source Medical Software Corporation, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Alison MarsdenPediatric Cardiology, Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

Funding

Multiscale modeling for vein graft failure risk stratification in CABG patientsR01HL123689 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI MARSDEN, ALISON L · 2014 to 2018
$1.9M
Enabling reliable cardiovascular simulations via uncertainty quantificationR01EB018302 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MARSDEN, ALISON L · 2016 to 2019
$1.7M
SCH: INT: A Virtual Surgery Simulator to Accelerate Medical Training in Cardiovascular Disease R01EB029362 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MARSDEN, ALISON L · 2019 to 2022
$1.4M
Automated data curation to ensure model credibility in the Vascular Model RepositoryR01LM013120 · NLM · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MARSDEN, ALISON L · 2019 to 2021
$1.0M
Directorate for Computer and Information Science and Engineering 1339824Directorate for Computer and Information Science and Engineering 1562450NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL123689NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB018302NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB029362NLM NIH HHS R01 LM013120
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this work is to reduce the user effort required for 2D segmentation when building patient-specific cardiovascular models using the SimVascular cardiovascular modeling software package. The proposed method uses a fully convolutional neural network (FCNN) to generate 2D cardiovascular segmentations. Given vessel pathlines, the neural network generates 2D vessel enhancement images along the pathlines. Thereafter, vessel segmentations are extracted using the marching-squares algorithm, which are then used to construct 3D cardiovascular models. The neural network is trained using a novel loss function, tailored for partially labeled segmentation data. An automated quality control method is also developed, allowing promising segmentations to be selected. Compared with a threshold and level set algorithm, the FCNN method improved 2D segmentation accuracy across several metrics. The proposed quality control approach further improved the average DICE score by 25.8%. In tests with users of SimVascular, when using quality control, users accepted 80% of segmentations produced by the best performing FCNN. The FCNN cardiovascular model building method reduces the amount of manual segmentation effort required for patient-specific model construction, by as much as 73%. This leads to reduced turnaround time for cardiovascular simulations. While the method was used for cardiovascular model building, it is applicable to general tubular structures. Graphical Abstract Proposed FCNN-based cardiovascular model building pipeline. a.) Image data and vessel pathline supplied by the user. b.) Path information is used to extract image pixel intensities in plane perpendicular to the vessel path. c.) 2D images extracted along vessel pathlines are input to the FCNN. d.) FCNN acts on the input images to compute local vessel enhancement images. e.) Vessel enhancement images computed by the FCNN, the pixel values are between 0 and 1 indicating vessel tissue likelihood. f.) The marching-squares algorithm is appliedto each enhanced image to extract the central vessel segmentation. g.) 2D extracted vessel surface points overlayed on original input images. h.) The 2D vessel surface points are transformed back to 3D space. i.) 3D crosssectional vessel surfaces are interpolated along the pathline to form the final vessel model.

Indexed as

Models, CardiovascularNeural Networks, ComputerAlgorithmsAutomationHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedProbabilityQuality ControlUncertaintyCardiovascular modelingCardiovascular simulationConvolutional neural networksPatient-specific modelingSimVascular

Identifiers

PMID31446517
PMCPMC7250144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.