Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31446513›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2019

Evaluation of telavancin susceptibility in isolates of Staphylococcus aureus with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin.

Allison R McMullen, William Lainhart, Meghan A Wallace, Angela Shupe, Carey-Ann D Burnham

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Allison R McMullenDepartment of Pathology & Immunology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA. amcmullen@augusta.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9080-2626
William LainhartDepartment of Pathology & Immunology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Meghan A WallaceDepartment of Pathology & Immunology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Angela ShupeDepartment of Pathology & Immunology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Carey-Ann D BurnhamDepartment of Pathology & Immunology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA. cburnham@wustl.edu.
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Theravance Biopharma US 0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Historically, vancomycin has been considered a primary therapeutic option for treating infections with Staphylococcus aureus, but isolates with reduced vancomycin susceptibility (SA-RVS) (MIC ≥ 4 μg/mL) have emerged. Telavancin, a semisynthetic lipoglycopeptide, is an alternative treatment option for S. aureus, but data examining telavancin activity against SA-RVS are limited. In the present study, we characterize 300 isolates of S. aureus isolates (50 vancomycin-susceptible (VSSA) isolates and 250 SA-RVS isolates) from a large tertiary care, academic medical center, 51.8% of which were methicillin resistant (MRSA). Sixteen (6.4%) SA-RVS isolates were non-susceptible to telavancin, whereas all VSSA isolates were susceptible. Additionally, 3.6% of SA-RVS isolates were non-susceptible to daptomycin, with three (1.2%) isolates testing non-susceptible to both telavancin and daptomycin. When tested against other classes of antimicrobials, there were no statistical differences in susceptibility of VSSA and SA-RVS isolates, except for the fluoroquinolones (ciprofloxacin and moxifloxacin). Molecular characterization of the isolates showed that SCCmec types II and IV together represented over half of the SA-RVS isolates; 12.0% of the VSSA isolates were SCCmec type II. Using RepPCR, we detected 16 distinct strain types in this isolate collection, and tst-1 (gene encoding the Staphylococcus toxic shock syndrome super-antigen) carriage was low (5.4%). Overall, we show that in addition to reduced vancomycin susceptibility, a small, but clinically significant, proportion of SA-RVS isolates also demonstrate reduced susceptibility to both telavancin and daptomycin.

Indexed as

Drug ToleranceAcademic Medical CentersAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAminoglycosidesAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial ProteinsDaptomycinFemaleHumansLipoglycopeptidesMaleMethicillin ResistanceMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAminoglycosidesAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial ProteinsDaptomycinLipoglycopeptidestelavancinVancomycinSA-RVSStaphylococcusStaphylococcus aureusSusceptibility testingTelavancinVancomycin

Identifiers

PMID31446513
OpenAlexW2969410260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.