Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31446492›Full record

GuidelineEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2019

Measuring and reporting of vertebral endplate bone marrow lesions as seen on MRI (Modic changes): recommendations from the ISSLS Degenerative Spinal Phenotypes Group.

Aaron J Fields, Michele C Battié, Richard J Herzog, Jeffrey G Jarvik, Roland Krug, Thomas M Link, Jeffrey C Lotz, Conor W O'Neill, Aseem Sharma, ISSLS Degenerative Spinal Phenotypes Group

Open access · hybridAbstract readPractice GuidelineReview
In one paragraph

Guideline in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Measurement of vertebral endplate bone marrow lesion (Modic change) composition with water-fat MRI and relationship to patient-reported outcome measures.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Aaron J FieldsDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, 513 Parnassus Avenue, S-1161, Box 0514, San Francisco, CA, 94143-0514, USA. aaron.fields@ucsf.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6460-4506
Michele C BattiéFaculty of Health Sciences and Western's Bone and Joint Institute, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada.
Richard J HerzogDepartment of Radiology, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.
Jeffrey G JarvikDepartments of Radiology, Neurosurgery and Health Services, and the Comparative Effectiveness, Cost and Outcomes Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Roland KrugDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Thomas M LinkDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Jeffrey C LotzDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, 513 Parnassus Avenue, S-1161, Box 0514, San Francisco, CA, 94143-0514, USA.
Conor W O'NeillDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, 513 Parnassus Avenue, S-1161, Box 0514, San Francisco, CA, 94143-0514, USA.
Aseem SharmaMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
ISSLS Degenerative Spinal Phenotypes Group
University of California, San Francisco · USMallinckrodt (United States) · USWestern University · CAHospital for Special Surgery · US

Funding

UCSF Core Center for Musculoskeletal Biology and MedicineP30AR066262 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI MAJUMDAR, SHARMILA · 2014 to 2018
$3.0M
Phenotypes of pathologic vertebral endplate degenerationR01AR063705 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LOTZ, JEFFREY C. · 2013 to 2017
$3.0M
Role of the cartilage endplate in spinal disc degenerationR01AR070198 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI FIELDS, AARON J · 2017 to 2021
$1.7M
NIAMS NIH HHS P30 AR066262NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR063705NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR070198
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe positive association between low back pain and MRI evidence of vertebral endplate bone marrow lesions, often called Modic changes (MC), offers the exciting prospect of diagnosing a specific phenotype of chronic low back pain (LBP). However, imprecision in the reporting of MC has introduced substantial challenges, as variations in both imaging equipment and scanning parameters can impact conspicuity of MC. This review discusses key methodological factors that impact MC classification and recommends guidelines for more consistent MC reporting that will allow for better integration of research into this LBP phenotype.

methodsNon-systematic literature review.

resultsThe high diagnostic specificity of MC classification for a painful level contributes to the significant association observed between MC and LBP, whereas low and variable sensitivity underlies the between- and within-study variability in observed associations. Poor sensitivity may be owing to the presence of other pain generators, to the limited MRI resolution, and to the imperfect reliability of MC classification, which lowers diagnostic sensitivity and thus influences the association between MC and LBP. Importantly, magnetic field strength and pulse sequence parameters also impact detection of MC. Advances in pulse sequences may improve reliability and prove valuable for quantifying lesion severity.

conclusionsComparison of MC data between studies can be problematic. Various methodological factors impact detection and classification of MC, and the lack of reporting guidelines hinders interpretation and comparison of findings. Thus, it is critical to adopt imaging and reporting standards that codify acceptable methodological criteria. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Indexed as

Bone MarrowLumbar VertebraeMagnetic Resonance ImagingHumansLow Back PainBone marrow lesionEndplate damageLow back painMagnetic resonance imagingModic changes

Identifiers

PMID31446492
PMCPMC7205555
OpenAlexW2969721622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.