Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31446447›Full record

ArticleSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2020

Incidence of anomalous canals in the base of the skull: a retrospective radio-anatomical study using cone-beam computed tomography.

Fatma Akkoca Kaplan, İbrahim Şevki Bayrakdar, Elif Bilgir

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Anatomical variations of clivus: a descriptive anatomical study.Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2021
    Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fatma Akkoca KaplanDepartment of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Faculty of Dentistry, Eskisehir, Turkey. fatmaakkoca92@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4522-656X
İbrahim Şevki BayrakdarDepartment of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Faculty of Dentistry, Eskisehir, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5036-9867
Elif BilgirDepartment of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Faculty of Dentistry, Eskisehir, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9521-4682
Eskişehir Osmangazi University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSeveral skull-base foramina including foramen meningo-orbitale, craniopharyngeal canals, canaliculus innominatus, foramen vesalius, palatovaginal canals, and canalis basalis medianus are visible on cone-beam computed tomographs. A good understanding of the anatomical variants of these foramina is important to accurately diagnose fractures, understand the paths that infections may take, and identify associated anomalies. We used cone-beam computed tomography to measure the incidences of skull-base foramen variants in a normal population.

methodsA total of 350 subjects (200 females, 150 males, 6-30 years of age) were included. The prevalences of foramen meningo-orbitale, craniopharyngeal canals, canaliculus innominatus, foramina vesalius, palatovaginal canals, and canalis basalis medianus were evaluated by age and gender.

resultsSubject age ranged from 6 to 30 years (mean age ± SD = 15.1 ± 4.08). Foramen meningo-orbitale, craniopharyngeal canals, canaliculus innominatus, foramen vesalius, palatovaginal canal, and canalis basalis medianus were observed in 51 (14.6%), 19 (5.4%), 60 (17.1%), 145 (41.1%), 34 (9.7%), and 15 (4.3%) patients, respectively.

conclusionsSkull-base foramina are important clinically and radiologically. Imaging of such variants via cone-beam computed tomography is valuable for both physicians and patients. Few studies of skull-base foramina have used cone-beam computed tomography. Additional research is required for a fuller understanding of this phenomenon.

Indexed as

Anatomic VariationAdolescentAdultChildCone-Beam Computed TomographyFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleRetrospective StudiesSkull BaseYoung AdultCanaliculus innominatusCone-beam computed tomographyCraniopharyngeal canalForamen meningo-orbitaleForamen vesaliusPalatovaginal canal

Identifiers

PMID31446447
OpenAlexW2969321137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.