Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31446444›Full record

Observational studyDiabetologia2019

In search of causal pathways in diabetes: a study using proteomics and genotyping data from a cross-sectional study.

Kristina Beijer, Christoph Nowak, Johan Sundström, Johan Ärnlöv, Tove Fall, Lars Lind

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Diabetologia, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Hallmarks of the metabolic secretome.Trends in endocrinology and metabolism: TEM · 2024
    Review
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kristina BeijerDepartment of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, UCR, Dag Hammarskjölds väg 38, SE-751 83, Uppsala, Sweden. Kristina.Beijer@medsci.uu.se.
Christoph NowakDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Family Medicine and Primary Care, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Johan SundströmDepartment of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, UCR, Dag Hammarskjölds väg 38, SE-751 83, Uppsala, Sweden.
Johan ÄrnlövDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Family Medicine and Primary Care, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Tove FallDepartment of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, UCR, Dag Hammarskjölds väg 38, SE-751 83, Uppsala, Sweden.
Lars LindDepartment of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, UCR, Dag Hammarskjölds väg 38, SE-751 83, Uppsala, Sweden.
Uppsala University · SEKarolinska Institutet · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aims/hypothesisThe pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes is not fully understood. We investigated whether circulating levels of preselected proteins were associated with the outcome 'diabetes' and whether these associations were causal.

methodsIn 2467 individuals of the population-based, cross-sectional EpiHealth study (45-75 years, 50% women), 249 plasma proteins were analysed by the proximity extension assay technique. DNA was genotyped using the Illumina HumanCoreExome-12 v1.0 BeadChip. Diabetes was defined as taking glucose-lowering treatment or having a fasting plasma glucose of ≥7.0 mmol/l. The associations between proteins and diabetes were assessed using logistic regression. To investigate causal relationships between proteins and diabetes, a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomisation was performed based on large, genome-wide association studies belonging to the DIAGRAM and MAGIC consortia, and a genome-wide association study in the EpiHealth study.

resultsTwenty-six proteins were positively associated with diabetes, including cathepsin D, retinal dehydrogenase 1, α-L-iduronidase, hydroxyacid oxidase 1 and galectin-4 (top five findings). Three proteins, lipoprotein lipase, IGF-binding protein 2 and paraoxonase 3 (PON-3), were inversely associated with diabetes. Fourteen of the proteins are novel discoveries. The Mendelian randomisation study did not disclose any significant causal effects between the proteins and diabetes in either direction that were consistent with the relationships found between the protein levels and diabetes. CONCLUSIONS/

interpretationThe 29 proteins associated with diabetes are involved in several physiological pathways, but given the power of the study no causal link was identified for those proteins tested in Mendelian randomisation. Therefore, the identified proteins are likely to be biomarkers for type 2 diabetes, rather than representing causal pathways.

Indexed as

Gene Expression RegulationGenotypeProteomicsAgedAlcohol OxidoreductasesAryldialkylphosphataseBiomarkersCathepsin DCross-Sectional StudiesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleGalectin 4HumansIduronidaseInsulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein 2Lipoprotein LipaseAlcohol OxidoreductasesAryldialkylphosphataseBiomarkersCathepsin DGalectin 4HAO1 protein, humanIduronidaseIGFBP2 protein, humanInsulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein 2Lipoprotein LipaseLPL protein, humanPON3 protein, humanRetinal DehydrogenaseDiabetesGenotypingMendelian randomisationProteomicsType 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID31446444
PMCPMC6805963
OpenAlexW2969935905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.