Observational studyDiabetologia2019
In search of causal pathways in diabetes: a study using proteomics and genotyping data from a cross-sectional study.
Observational study in Diabetologia, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.
- Proteomic mechanistic profile of patients with diabetes at risk of developing heart failure: insights from the HOMAGE trial.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2021Trial
- Large-Scale Proteomics Uncovers Pre-Disease Inflammation-Lipid Subtypes to Refine Risk Stratification and Prediction of Type 2 Diabetes.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2026Article
- Functional genomic dissection and prediction of body size traits in pigs.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2026Article
- Proteomic Signatures of 3-Year Progression From Impaired Fasting Glucose to Diabetes: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study.Diabetes care · 2026Article
- Article
- Lysosomal dysfunction in diabetes and diabetic complications.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
- Article
- Association of Elevated Galectin-4 Concentrations with Obesity, Diabetes, and Cardiovascular Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Network Mendelian randomisation analysis deciphers protein pathways linking type 2 diabetes and gastrointestinal disease.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2025Article
- Longitudinal clinical and proteomic diabetes signatures in women with a history of gestational diabetes.JCI insight · 2024Article
- Lessons and Applications of Omics Research in Diabetes Epidemiology.Current diabetes reports · 2024Review
- Genotype-based precision nutrition strategies for the prediction and clinical management of type 2 diabetes mellitus.World journal of diabetes · 2024Review
- Association of plasma proteomics with incident coronary heart disease in individuals with and without type 2 diabetes: results from the population-based KORA study.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2024Article
- Targeted Proteomics Reveals Functional Targets for Early Diabetes Susceptibility in Young Adults.Circulation. Genomic and precision medicine · 2024Article
- Mendelian randomization analysis demonstrates the causal effects of IGF family members in diabetes.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Hallmarks of the metabolic secretome.Trends in endocrinology and metabolism: TEM · 2024Review
- Galectin-4 is associated with diabetes and obesity in a heart failure population.Scientific reports · 2023Observational
- Associations of plasma proteomics with type 2 diabetes and related traits: results from the longitudinal KORA S4/F4/FF4 Study.Diabetologia · 2023Article
- Proteomic Predictors of Incident Diabetes: Results From the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study.Diabetes care · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aims/hypothesisThe pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes is not fully understood. We investigated whether circulating levels of preselected proteins were associated with the outcome 'diabetes' and whether these associations were causal.
methodsIn 2467 individuals of the population-based, cross-sectional EpiHealth study (45-75 years, 50% women), 249 plasma proteins were analysed by the proximity extension assay technique. DNA was genotyped using the Illumina HumanCoreExome-12 v1.0 BeadChip. Diabetes was defined as taking glucose-lowering treatment or having a fasting plasma glucose of ≥7.0 mmol/l. The associations between proteins and diabetes were assessed using logistic regression. To investigate causal relationships between proteins and diabetes, a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomisation was performed based on large, genome-wide association studies belonging to the DIAGRAM and MAGIC consortia, and a genome-wide association study in the EpiHealth study.
resultsTwenty-six proteins were positively associated with diabetes, including cathepsin D, retinal dehydrogenase 1, α-L-iduronidase, hydroxyacid oxidase 1 and galectin-4 (top five findings). Three proteins, lipoprotein lipase, IGF-binding protein 2 and paraoxonase 3 (PON-3), were inversely associated with diabetes. Fourteen of the proteins are novel discoveries. The Mendelian randomisation study did not disclose any significant causal effects between the proteins and diabetes in either direction that were consistent with the relationships found between the protein levels and diabetes. CONCLUSIONS/
interpretationThe 29 proteins associated with diabetes are involved in several physiological pathways, but given the power of the study no causal link was identified for those proteins tested in Mendelian randomisation. Therefore, the identified proteins are likely to be biomarkers for type 2 diabetes, rather than representing causal pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.