SynthesisBMJ open2019
Valuing the impact of health and social care programs using social return on investment analysis: how have academics advanced the methodology? A systematic review.
Synthesis in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Social return on investment (SROI) method to evaluate physical activity and sport interventions: a systematic review.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2020Pooled it
- Evaluating the social return on investment of nature-based social prescribing to alleviate loneliness: a randomized controlled trial in Barcelona.Frontiers in public health · 2026Trial
- Valuing impact: Estimating return on investment of mental health and wellbeing projects for veterans and first responders.PloS one · 2026Article
- Article
- Prostate Cancer Specialist Nursing Program: A Social Return on Investment Analysis Value for Money of the Prostate Cancer Specialist Nursing Program.Psycho-oncology · 2025Article
- A social return on investment analysis of patient-reported outcome measures in value-based healthcare.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2025Article
- Hospital in-reach family-centred social prescribing pilot for children with neurodisability: mixed methods evaluation with social return on investment analysis.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Calculating the social impact of home automation for people with disability: A social return on investment study.Australian occupational therapy journal · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- "Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Consensus on a social return on investment model of physical activity and sport: a Delphi study protocol.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2024Article
- Economic evaluation of a community health worker model for tuberculosis care in Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam: a mixed-methods Social Return on Investment Analysis.BMC public health · 2023Article
- Comparing the economic terms of biotechnology licenses from academic institutions with those between commercial firms.PloS one · 2023Article
- Article
- The impact of improving haemophilia A management within the Spanish National Healthcare System: a social return on investment analysis.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- A Social Return on Investment Analysis of Improving the Management of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Within the Spanish National Healthcare System.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2022Article
- 'What You See is All There is': The Importance of Heuristics in Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) and Social Return on Investment (SROI) in the Evaluation of Public Health Interventions.Applied health economics and health policy · 2021Review
- Social value of maintaining baby-friendly hospital initiative accreditation in Australia: case study.International journal for equity in health · 2021Article
- Social Return on Investment Analysis of the Health Precinct Community Hub for Chronic Conditions.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo identify how social return on investment (SROI) analysis-traditionally used by business consultants-has been interpreted, used and innovated by academics in the health and social care sector and to assess the quality of peer-reviewed SROI studies in this sector.
designSystematic review. SETTINGS: Community and residential settings.
participantsA wide range of demographic groups and age groups.
resultsThe following databases were searched: Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, Econlit, Medline, PsychINFO, Embase, Emerald, Social Care Online and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Limited uptake of SROI methodology by academics was found in the health and social care sector. From 868 papers screened, 8 studies met the criteria for inclusion in this systematic review. Study quality was found to be highly variable, ranging from 38% to 90% based on scores from a purpose-designed quality assessment tool. In general, relatively high consistency and clarity was observed in the reporting of the research question, reasons for using this methodology and justifying the need for the study. However, weaknesses were observed in other areas including justifying stakeholders, reporting sample sizes, undertaking sensitivity analysis and reporting unexpected or negative outcomes. Most papers cited links to additional materials to aid in reporting. There was little evidence that academics had innovated or advanced the methodology beyond that outlined in a much-cited SROI guide.
conclusionAcademics have thus far been slow to adopt SROI methodology in the evaluation of health and social care interventions, and there is little evidence of innovation and development of the methodology. The word count requirements of peer-reviewed journals may make it difficult for authors to be fully transparent about the details of their studies, potentially impacting the quality of reporting in those studies published in these journals. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018080195.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.