Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31446308›Full record

ArticleTranslational oncology2019

Prognostic Factors and Treatment Strategies for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma from 2004 to 2013: Population-Based SEER Analysis.

Jieqiong Liu, Meizuo Zhong, Yuhua Feng, Shan Zeng, Yikai Wang, Hongbo Xu, Hui Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Detection of Tumor Multifocality in Resectable Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Defining the Optimal Pre-operative Imaging Modality.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2021
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jieqiong LiuDepartment of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, China. Electronic address: liujieqiong8708@163.com.
Meizuo ZhongDepartment of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, China. Electronic address: zhongmeizuo@188.com.
Yuhua FengDepartment of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, China. Electronic address: fyh87256630@csu.edu.cn.
Shan ZengDepartment of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, China. Electronic address: shanzeng2012@qq.com.
Yikai WangDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, 30322, US. Electronic address: yikai.wang@emory.edu.
Hongbo XuDepartment of Surgery The third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 4100013, China. Electronic address: xu.hongbo@csu.edu.cn.
Hui ZhouAffiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya Medical School, Central South University / Hunan Cancer Hospital, Changsha, 410013, China. Electronic address: zhouhui9403@126.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeventy percent of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) patients are inoperable. Treatment for unresectable patients is essential to improve poor survival.

aimsWe aimed to evaluate the prognostic factors for ICC patients, and investigate the potential treatment strategies for unresectable patients.

methodsICC patients were identified in SEER registry in 2004-2013. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis were performed to evaluate the effect of treatment strategies.

resultsOf 2248 cases diagnosed in 2010-2013 and staged according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 7th edition, 1706 (76.13%) did not receive cancer-directed surgery. This portion increased compared to those diagnosed between 2004 and 2009 and staged according to the AJCC 6th edition (72.87%). In addition, the percentage of stage 4 cases increased, while stage 3 cases decreased, because AJCC 7th staging system categorized both T4 and N1 patients into stage IV, which were previously categorized into stage III by AJCC 6th staging system. Patients with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) showed a poorer survival in 2004-2009 (P = .0213), but an almost the same survival as patients with tumor resection in 2010-2013 (P = .51), suggesting that RFA performed better in recent years. Lymphadenectomy showed protective effect for unresectable patients. Radiotherapy improved cancer-specific survival in non-surgery patients (P < .0001).The proportion of stage IV patients increased tremendously from 37.4% in 2004-2009 to 58.7% in 2010-2013. Among 1319 stage IV patients (2010-2013), surgery at distant metastatic sites improved cancer-specific survival.

conclusionsFor unresectable tumors, RFA, radiotherapy, lymphadenectomy, and surgery of distant metastases showed significant benefits to improve cancer-specific survival.

Identifiers

PMID31446308
PMCPMC6717067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.