Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31446141›Full record

Trial reportJournal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer2019

Monitoring Therapeutic Response and Resistance: Analysis of Circulating Tumor DNA in Patients With ALK+ Lung Cancer.

Leora Horn, Jennifer G Whisenant, Heather Wakelee, Karen L Reckamp, Huan Qiao, Ticiana A Leal, Liping Du, Jennifer Hernandez, Vincent Huang, George R Blumenschein and 13 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06167460 (Analysis of Circulating Tumor DNA Dynamics to Predict and Monitor Response to Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Patients With Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 105 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
105citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
17.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06167460 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Analysis of Circulating Tumor DNA Dynamics to Predict and Monitor Response to Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Patients With Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

TypeobservationalSponsorGene SolutionsRan2023 to 2025Enrolled50ConditionsNon Small Cell Lung Cancer, Stage IIIB Non-small Cell Lung Cancer, Stage IIIC Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, Stage IV Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

105 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 159 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Diagnostic accuracy of next-generation sequencing (NGS) for identifying actionable mutations in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

45 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 13 institutions in 1 country.

Leora HornDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, Tennessee. Electronic address: leora.horn@vumc.org.
Jennifer G WhisenantDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Heather WakeleeStanford Advanced Medicine Center, Palo Alto, California.
Karen L ReckampCity of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California.
Huan QiaoDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Ticiana A LealUniversity of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin.
Liping DuDepartment of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Jennifer HernandezResolution Biosciences, Redmond, Washington.
Vincent HuangDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
George R BlumenscheinDepartment of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of TX MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Saiama N WaqarWashington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Sandip P PatelUniversity of California at San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, California.
Jorge NievaUniversity of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California.
Geoffrey R OxnardDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachussetts.
Rachel E SanbornEarle A. Chiles Research Institute, Providence Cancer Center, Portland, Oregon.
Tristan ShafferResolution Biosciences, Redmond, Washington.
Kavita GargResolution Biosciences, Redmond, Washington.
Allison HolzhausenXcovery Holdings, Inc., Palm Beach Gardens, Florida.
Kimberly HarrowXcovery Holdings, Inc., Palm Beach Gardens, Florida.
Chris LiangXcovery Holdings, Inc., Palm Beach Gardens, Florida.
Lee P LimResolution Biosciences, Redmond, Washington.
Mark LiResolution Biosciences, Redmond, Washington.
Christine M LovlyDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Vanderbilt University Medical Center · USXcovery (United States) · USVanderbilt-Ingram Cancer CenterCity of Hope · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USProvidence Portland Medical Center · USStanford Medicine · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of California, San Diego · USUniversity of Southern California · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · USVanderbilt University · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

The Role of Focal Oncogene Amplifications in Lung CancerP01CA129243 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI Andrea Ventura · 2007 to 2026
$31.2M
Vanderbilt Clinical Oncology Research Career Development ProgramK12CA090625 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Debra L. Friedman, Paula Jill Hurley · 2001 to 2026
$16.9M
Overcoming acquired resistance to EGFR inhibitors in lung cancerR01CA121210 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI LOVLY, CHRISTINE M. · 2007 to 2016
$2.9M
Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation CI-65-13NCI NIH HHS K12 CA090625NCI NIH HHS P01 CA129243NCI NIH HHS R01 CA121210
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDespite initial effectiveness of ALK receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in patients with ALK+ NSCLC, therapeutic resistance will ultimately develop. Serial tracking of genetic alterations detected in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) can be an informative strategy to identify response and resistance. This study evaluated the utility of analyzing ctDNA as a function of response to ensartinib, a potent second-generation ALK TKI.

methodsPre-treatment plasma was collected from 76 patients with ALK+ NSCLC who were ALK TKI-naive or had received prior ALK TKI, and analyzed for specific genetic alterations. Longitudinal plasma samples were analyzed from a subset (n = 11) of patients. Analysis of pre-treatment tumor biopsy specimens from 22 patients was compared with plasma.

resultsDisease-associated genetic alterations were detected in 74% (56 of 76) of patients, the most common being EML4-ALK. Concordance of ALK fusion between plasma and tissue was 91% (20 of 22 blood and tissue samples). Twenty-four ALK kinase domain mutations were detected in 15 patients, all had previously received an ALK TKI; G1269A was the most prevalent (4 of 24). Patients with a detectable EML4-ALK variant 1 (V1) fusion had improved response (9 of 17 patients; 53%) to ensartinib compared to patients with EML4-ALK V3 fusion (one of seven patients; 14%). Serial changes in ALK alterations were observed during therapy.

conclusionsClinical utility of ctDNA was shown, both at pre-treatment by identifying a potential subgroup of ALK+ NSCLC patients who may derive more benefit from ensartinib and longitudinally by tracking resistance. Prospective application of this technology may translate to improved outcomes for NSCLC patients treated with ALK TKIs.

Indexed as

MutationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnaplastic Lymphoma KinaseCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCirculating Tumor DNADrug Resistance, NeoplasmFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedOncogene Proteins, FusionPiperazinesPrognosisALK protein, humanAnaplastic Lymphoma KinaseCirculating Tumor DNAEML4-ALK fusion protein, humanensartinibOncogene Proteins, FusionPiperazinesProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyridazinesALK receptor tyrosine kinaseCirculating tumor DNALiquid biopsiesNext-generation sequencingNSCLC

Identifiers

PMID31446141
PMCPMC6823161
OpenAlexW2969431490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.