Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31445869›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of arthroplasty2019

Variation in the Thickness of Knee Cartilage. The Use of a Novel Machine Learning Algorithm for Cartilage Segmentation of Magnetic Resonance Images.

Romil F Shah, Alejandro M Martinez, Valentina Pedoia, Sharmila Majumdar, Thomas P Vail, Stefano A Bini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of arthroplasty, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Cartilage · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The knee connectome: A novel tool for studying spatiotemporal change in cartilage thickness.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Romil F ShahDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Alejandro M MartinezDepartment of Radiology, University of California-San Francisco, Musculoskeletal and Imaging Research Group, San Francisco, CA.
Valentina PedoiaDepartment of Radiology, University of California-San Francisco, Musculoskeletal and Imaging Research Group, San Francisco, CA.
Sharmila MajumdarDepartment of Radiology, University of California-San Francisco, Musculoskeletal and Imaging Research Group, San Francisco, CA.
Thomas P VailDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Stefano A BiniDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.

Funding

Deep Learning for Characterizing Knee Joint Degeneration Predicting Progression of Osteoarthritis and Total Knee ReplacementR61AR073552 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI MAJUMDAR, SHARMILA, PEDOIA, VALENTINA · 2018 to 2019
$871k
Multidimensional MRI-based Non-Euclidean Deep Learning to Study OsteoarthritisR00AR070902 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI PEDOIA, VALENTINA · 2018 to 2020
$747k
NIAMS NIH HHS R00 AR070902NIAMS NIH HHS R61 AR073552
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe variation in articular cartilage thickness (ACT) in healthy knees is difficult to quantify and therefore poorly documented. Our aims are to (1) define how machine learning (ML) algorithms can automate the segmentation and measurement of ACT on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (2) use ML to provide reference data on ACT in healthy knees, and (3) identify whether demographic variables impact these results.

methodsPatients recruited into the Osteoarthritis Initiative with a radiographic Kellgren-Lawrence grade of 0 or 1 with 3D double-echo steady-state MRIs were included and their gender, age, and body mass index were collected. Using a validated ML algorithm, 2 orthogonal points on each femoral condyle were identified (distal and posterior) and ACT was measured on each MRI. Site-specific ACT was compared using paired t-tests, and multivariate regression was used to investigate the risk-adjusted effect of each demographic variable on ACT.

resultsA total of 3910 MRI were included. The average femoral ACT was 2.34 mm (standard deviation, 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.95-3.73). In multivariate analysis, distal-medial (-0.17 mm) and distal-lateral cartilage (-0.32 mm) were found to be thinner than posterior-lateral cartilage, while posterior-medial cartilage was found to be thicker (0.21 mm). In addition, female sex was found to negatively impact cartilage thickness (OR, -0.36; all values: P < .001).

conclusionML was effectively used to automate the segmentation and measurement of cartilage thickness on a large number of MRIs of healthy knees to provide normative data on the variation in ACT in this population. We further report patient variables that can influence ACT. Further validation will determine whether this technique represents a powerful new tool for tracking the impact of medical intervention on the progression of articular cartilage degeneration.

Indexed as

Machine LearningAgedAlgorithmsBody Mass IndexCartilage, ArticularDisease ProgressionFemaleFemurHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedKnee JointMagnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate Analysisarthritiscartilage segmentationcartilage thicknessknee cartilagemachine learning

Identifiers

PMID31445869
PMCPMC7251923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.