ArticleActa medica portuguesa2019
[Analysis of the Cochrane Review: Exercise-Based Cardiac Rehabilitation for Coronary Heart Disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;1:CD001800].
Article in Acta medica portuguesa, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- The patient education strategy "learning and coping" improves adherence to cardiac rehabilitation in primary healthcare settings: a pragmatic cluster-controlled trial.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2022Trial
- Aerobic Exercise under Cold Conditions May Affect the Cardiac Structure by Elevating the Galectin 3 and CK-MB Levels.Journal of human kinetics · 2026Article
- Rural-Urban Differences in Outcomes of Acute Cardiac Admissions in a Large Health Service.JACC. Advances · 2024Article
- Effects of different early cardiac rehabilitation exercise treatments on the prognosis of acute myocardial infarction patients receiving percutaneous coronary intervention.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coronary heart disease is the single most common cause of death globally, accounting for one-third of all deaths. However, with falling coronary heart disease mortality rates, an increasing number of people live with the disease and may need support to manage their symptoms and prognosis. A complex intervention that may involve a variety of therapies, cardiac rehabilitation includes exercise, risk factor education, behavioral change, psychological support, and strategies that are aimed at targeting traditional risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Cardiac rehabilitation is an essential part of contemporary heart disease care and is considered a priority in countries with a high prevalence of coronary heart disease. This Cochrane systematic review constitutes an update of a Cochrane review published in 2011, having identified 16 new trials (3872 participants), predominantly post-myocardial infarction and post-revascularization patients. Therefore, it included 63 randomized trials looking at the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation in patients with coronary heart disease. The quality of the evidence ranged from low to moderate. The main results highlight the effect of cardiac rehabilitation, in comparison with absence of physical exercise, in the reduction in cardiovascular mortality, with no reduction, however, in total mortality. The overall risk of hospital admissions was reduced with cardiac rehabilitation but there was no significant impact on the risk of myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass graft or percutaneous coronary intervention. This paper aims to summarize and discuss the main results and conclusions of this systematic review, as well as its implications for the daily clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.