Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31445518›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2019

Metabolomics for predicting hyperglycemia in pregnancy: a protocol for a systematic review and potential meta-analysis.

Bianca Fioravanti Nicolosi, Debora F Leite, Jussara Mayrink, Renato T Souza, José Guilherme Cecatti, Iracema de Mattos Paranhos Calderon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bianca Fioravanti NicolosiDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University-UNESP, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.
Debora F LeiteDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Medicine, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Jussara MayrinkDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Medicine, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Renato T SouzaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Medicine, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
José Guilherme CecattiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Medicine, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil. cecatti@unicamp.br.
Iracema de Mattos Paranhos CalderonDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Botucatu Medical School, São Paulo State University-UNESP, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHyperglycemia in pregnancy (HIP) has been recently differentiated between diabetes in pregnancy (DIP) and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). The proposed protocol is relevant, and clinical concern is due to the higher risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes (APO) and long-term effects on both the mother and the fetus. Fasting plasma glucose level (FPG) and oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) are current diagnostic tools. However, controversy persists concerning diagnostic criteria, cut-off points, and even selective or universal screening. The objective of this systematic review is to assess the performance of metabolomic markers in the prediction of HIP.

methodsThis is a protocol for a systematic review with potential meta-analysis. The primary outcome is GDM, defined as glucose intolerance identified in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy (any FPG ≥ 92 mg/dL and < 126 mg/dL OR when 75-g OGTT shows one altered value among these: FPG ≥ 92 mg/dL or 1-h post glucose load ≥ 180 mg/dL or 2-h post glucose load ≥ 153 mg/dL); the secondary outcome is HIP, defined as hyperglycemia detected in the first trimester of pregnancy (any FPG ≥ 126 mg/dL). A detailed systematic literature search will be carried out in electronic databases and conference abstracts, using the keywords "gestational diabetes mellitus," "metabolomics," "pregnancy," and "screening" (and their variations). We will include original peer-reviewed articles published from Jan 1, 1999, to Dec 31, 2018. Original studies including diabetes diagnosed before pregnancy (T2DM and T1DM), multiple pregnancies, and congenital malformations will be excluded. All results regarding samples, participant characteristics, metabolomic techniques, and diagnostic accuracy measures will be retrieved and analyzed. Since this is a systematic review, no ethical approval is necessary. DISCUSSION: This systematic review may have the potential to provide significant evidence-based findings on the prediction performance of metabolomics. There are short and long-term repercussions for the mother and the newborn. Therefore, both may benefit from an accurate prediction technique for HIP. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: This protocol was registered in the PROSPERO platform under number CRD42018100175 .

Indexed as

Diabetes, GestationalHyperglycemiaMetabolomicsPregnancy ComplicationsBlood GlucoseFemaleGlucose Tolerance TestHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicPregnancyRisk AssessmentSystematic Reviews as TopicBlood GlucoseGestational diabetes mellitusHigh-risk pregnancyHyperglycemia in pregnancyMetabolomics, biomarkers

Identifiers

PMID31445518
PMCPMC6708156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.