Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31445502›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2019

Lessons learned by giving amphetamine to antipsychotic-medicated schizophrenia patients.

Neal R Swerdlow, Savita G Bhakta, Jo Talledo, Lindsay Benster, Juliana Kotz, Maria Lavadia, Gregory A Light

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Neal R SwerdlowDepartment of Psychiatry, 0804, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA. nswerdlow@ucsd.edu.
Savita G BhaktaDepartment of Psychiatry, 0804, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5560-8011
Jo TalledoDepartment of Psychiatry, 0804, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA.
Lindsay BensterDepartment of Psychiatry, 0804, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA.
Juliana KotzDepartment of Psychiatry, 0804, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA.
Maria LavadiaDepartment of Psychiatry, 0804, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA.
Gregory A LightDepartment of Psychiatry, 0804, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA.
University of California San Diego · US

Funding

Pharmacologic augmentation of neurocognition and cognitive training in psychosisR01MH059803 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI SWERDLOW, NEAL R · 1999 to 2018
$4.5M
Memantine effects on sensorimotor gating and neurocognition in schizophreniaR01MH094320 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI SWERDLOW, NEAL R · 2012 to 2020
$2.6M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH059803NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH094320
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Experimental Medicine studies in psychiatric populations test specific, mechanistic hypotheses related to the biology of mental illness, by combining well-characterized neurobiological probes and laboratory-based measures of behavioral performance and neurobiology. However, scientific inquiry through the acute administration of psychoactive drugs to patients with serious mental illness raises important ethical issues. These issues arise in studies in which the psychostimulant, amphetamine, is used as an Experimental Medicine probe in patients with schizophrenia. In this study, we summarize relevant aspects of our experience with acute, laboratory-based challenges of amphetamine in schizophrenia patients. Schizophrenia patients participated in one or more Experimental Medicine studies involving limited doses of amphetamine with clinical monitoring, over a 4-year period. Acute (within hours of ingestion; collective n = 53), subacute (three active doses over 4 weeks; n = 28), and long-term (mean = 17 months after ingestion; n = 19) effects of amphetamine ingestion were assessed. In antipsychotic (AP)-medicated schizophrenia patients, amphetamine was associated with no detrimental subjective, autonomic, or functional changes. Symptoms assessed acutely, subacutely, or long term were either unchanged or diminished. No adverse acute, subacute, or long-term consequences from the Experimental Medicine use of amphetamine in antipsychotic-medicated schizophrenia patients were detected. These findings do not address the safety or effectiveness of the use of amphetamine in unmedicated patients, or as an adjunctive treatment for schizophrenia. Indeed, it is important to distinguish evidence-based risks of symptom exacerbation in an Experimental Medicine setting vs. risks associated with long-term, daily clinical use or even misuse of amphetamine.

Indexed as

Schizophrenic PsychologyAdultAmphetamineAntipsychotic AgentsBlood PressureDopamine AgentsFemaleHeart RateHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsSchizophreniaAmphetamineAntipsychotic AgentsDopamine Agents

Identifiers

PMID31445502
PMCPMC6897898
OpenAlexW2969807810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.