Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31445278›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of medical informatics2019

Eye-tracking retrospective think-aloud as a novel approach for a usability evaluation.

Hwayoung Cho, Dakota Powell, Adrienne Pichon, Lisa M Kuhns, Robert Garofalo, Rebecca Schnall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of medical informatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Human Factors and Organizational Issues.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2020
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hwayoung ChoCollege of Nursing, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States. Electronic address: hcho@ufl.edu.
Dakota PowellSchool of Nursing, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.
Adrienne PichonSchool of Nursing, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.
Lisa M KuhnsDivision of Adolescent Medicine, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States; Department of Pediatrics, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.
Robert GarofaloDivision of Adolescent Medicine, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States; Department of Pediatrics, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.
Rebecca SchnallSchool of Nursing, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.

Funding

A Pragmatic Clinical Trial of MyPEEPS Mobile to Improve HIV prevention Behaviors in Diverse Adolescent MSMU01MD011279 · NIMHD · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI GAROFALO, ROBERT, SCHNALL, REBECCA · 2016 to 2020
$8.0M
NIMHD NIH HHS U01 MD011279
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo report on the use of an eye-tracking retrospective think-aloud for usability evaluation and to describe its application in assessing the usability of a mobile health app. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe used an eye-tracking retrospective think-aloud to evaluate the usability of an HIV prevention mobile app among 20 young men (15-18 years) in New York City, NY; Birmingham, AL; and Chicago, IL. Task performance metrics, critical errors, a task completion rate per participant, and a task completion rate per task, were measured. Eye-tracking metrics including fixation, saccades, time to first fixation, time spent, and revisits were measured and compared among participants with/without a critical error.

resultsUsing task performance analysis, we identified 19 critical errors on four activities, and of those, two activities had a task completion rate of less than 78%. To better understand these usability issues, we thoroughly analyzed participants' corresponding eye movements and verbal comments using an in-depth problem analysis. In areas of interest created for the activity with critical usability problems, there were significant differences in time spent (p = 0.008), revisits (p = 0.004), and total numbers of fixations (p = 0.007) by participants with/without a critical error. The overall mean score of perceived usability rated by the Health IT Usability Evaluation Scale was 4.64 (SD = 0.33), reflecting strong usability of the app. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionAn eye-tracking retrospective think-aloud enabled us to identify critical usability problems as well as gain an in-depth understanding of the usability issues related to interactions between end-users and the app. Findings from this study highlight the utility of an eye-tracking retrospective think-aloud in consumer health usability evaluation research.

Indexed as

Mobile ApplicationsAdolescentHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesTelemedicineVision, OcularEye movement measurementsEye movementsEye-trackingHealth ITInformation technologyMobile applicationsMobile healthUsability evaluation

Identifiers

PMID31445278
PMCPMC6717560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.