Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31445247›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of medical informatics2019

Automatic trial eligibility surveillance based on unstructured clinical data.

Stéphane M Meystre, Paul M Heider, Youngjun Kim, Daniel B Aruch, Carolyn D Britten

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of medical informatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Clinical Research Informatics: a Decade-in-Review.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Stéphane M MeystreBiomedical Informatics Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States; Division of Hematology/Oncology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States. Electronic address: meystre@musc.edu.
Paul M HeiderBiomedical Informatics Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States.
Youngjun KimBiomedical Informatics Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States.
Daniel B AruchDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States.
Carolyn D BrittenDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States.

Funding

Translational Science Laboratory Shared ResourceP30CA138313 · NCI · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI Jian Ouyang · 2009 to 2026
$42.7M
South Carolina Clinical & Translational Research Institute (SCTR)UL1TR001450 · NCATS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI BRADY, KATHLEEN T., FLUME, PATRICK A · 2015 to 2024
$41.1M
Medical University of South Carolina NCORP Minority/Underserved Community SiteUG1CA189848 · NCI · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI Marvella Elizabeth Ford, Evan Michael Graboyes · 2014 to 2026
$11.0M
South Carolina Cancer Disparities Research Center (SC CADRE)U54CA210962 · NCI · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI FORD, MARVELLA ELIZABETH, SALLEY, JUDITH · 2017 to 2023
$6.7M
South Carolina Cancer Disparities Research Center (SC CaDRe)U54CA210963 · NCI · SOUTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI FORD, MARVELLA ELIZABETH, SALLEY, JUDITH · 2017 to 2023
$6.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001450NCI NIH HHS P30 CA138313NCI NIH HHS U54 CA210962NCI NIH HHS U54 CA210963NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189848
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionInsufficient patient enrollment in clinical trials remains a serious and costly problem and is often considered the most critical issue to solve for the clinical trials community. In this project, we assessed the feasibility of automatically detecting a patient's eligibility for a sample of breast cancer clinical trials by mapping coded clinical trial eligibility criteria to the corresponding clinical information automatically extracted from text in the EHR.

methodsThree open breast cancer clinical trials were selected by oncologists. Their eligibility criteria were manually abstracted from trial descriptions using the OHDSI ATLAS web application. Patients enrolled or screened for these trials were selected as 'positive' or 'possible' cases. Other patients diagnosed with breast cancer were selected as 'negative' cases. A selection of the clinical data and all clinical notes of these 229 selected patients was extracted from the MUSC clinical data warehouse and stored in a database implementing the OMOP common data model. Eligibility criteria were extracted from clinical notes using either manually crafted pattern matching (regular expressions) or a new natural language processing (NLP) application. These extracted criteria were then compared with reference criteria from trial descriptions. This comparison was realized with three different versions of a new application: rule-based, cosine similarity-based, and machine learning-based.

resultsFor eligibility criteria extraction from clinical notes, the machine learning-based NLP application allowed for the highest accuracy with a micro-averaged recall of 90.9% and precision of 89.7%. For trial eligibility determination, the highest accuracy was reached by the machine learning-based approach with a per-trial AUC between 75.5% and 89.8%.

conclusionNLP can be used to extract eligibility criteria from EHR clinical notes and automatically discover patients possibly eligible for a clinical trial with good accuracy, which could be leveraged to reduce the workload of humans screening patients for trials.

Indexed as

Eligibility DeterminationAutomationBreast NeoplasmsDatabases, FactualData WarehousingFemaleHumansMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedNatural Language ProcessingPatient SelectionWorkloadClinical trialEligibility criteriaMachine learningNatural language processing

Identifiers

PMID31445247
PMCPMC6717538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.