Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31444910›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology2020

Evidence for central antispastic effect of botulinum toxin type A.

Ivica Matak

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of pharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ivica MatakLaboratory of Molecular Neuropharmacology, Department of Pharmacology, University of Zagreb School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia.
University of Zagreb · HR

Funding

European Social Fund and Croatian Ministry of Science, Education and Sport HR.3.2.01-0178
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeBotulinum toxin type A (BoNT/A) injections into hyperactive muscles provide effective treatment for spasticity and dystonias, presumably due to its local effects on extrafusal and intrafusal motor fibres. A recent discovery of toxin's retrograde axonal transport to CNS might suggest additional action sites. However, in comparison to cholinergic peripheral terminals, functional consequences of BoNT/A direct central action on abnormally increased muscle tone are presently unknown. To address this question, the central effects of BoNT/A were assessed in experimental local spastic paralysis. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Local spastic paralysis was induced by injection of tetanus toxin (1.5 ng) into rat gastrocnemius. Subsequently, BoNT/A (5 U·kg KEY

resultsTetanus toxin evoked muscular spasm (sustained rigid hind paw extension and resistance to passive ankle flexion). Subsequent injections of BoNT/A, i.m. or i.n, reduced tetanus toxin-evoked spastic paralysis. Beneficial effects of i.n. BoNT/A and occurrence of cleaved SNAP-25 in ventral horn were prevented by i.t. antitoxin. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Axonally transported BoNT/A relieves muscle hypertonia induced by tetanus toxin, following the trans-synaptic movement of BoNT/A in the CNS. These results suggest that such direct, centrally mediated reduction of abnormal muscle tone might contribute to the effectiveness of BoNT/A in spasticity and hyperkinetic movement disorders.

Indexed as

AnimalsBotulinum Toxins, Type AMaleMuscle, SkeletalMuscle SpasticityParasympatholyticsRatsRats, WistarTetanus ToxinBotulinum Toxins, Type AParasympatholyticsTetanus Toxin

Identifiers

PMID31444910
PMCPMC6976784
OpenAlexW2969499758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.