Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31444875›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2019

Identifying Attrition Phases in Survey Data: Applicability and Assessment Study.

Camille J Hochheimer, Roy T Sabo, Robert A Perera, Nitai Mukhopadhyay, Alex H Krist

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Camille J HochheimerDepartment of Biostatistics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0984-0909
Roy T SaboDepartment of Biostatistics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5866-2598
Robert A PereraDepartment of Biostatistics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0375-0427
Nitai MukhopadhyayDepartment of Biostatistics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1530-9516
Alex H KristDepartment of Family Medicine and Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4060-9155

Funding

Research Supplement to Promote Diversity in Health Related ResearchUL1TR002649 · NCATS · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI MOELLER, FREDERICK GERARD · 2018 to 2022
$19.1M
Implementing Personal Health Records to Promote Evidence-Based Cancer ScreeningR01CA168795 · NCI · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI KRIST, ALEXANDER H · 2013 to 2017
$3.0M
An Interactive Preventive Health Record (IPHR) to Promote Patient-Centered CareR18HS017046 · AHRQ · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI KRIST, ALEXANDER H · 2007 to 2009
$1.2M
AHRQ HHS R18 HS017046NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002649NCI NIH HHS R01 CA168795
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough Web-based questionnaires are an efficient, increasingly popular mode of data collection, their utility is often challenged by high participant dropout. Researchers can gain insight into potential causes of high participant dropout by analyzing the dropout patterns.

objectiveThis study proposed the application of and assessed the use of user-specified and existing hypothesis testing methods in a novel setting-survey dropout data-to identify phases of higher or lower survey dropout.

methodsFirst, we proposed the application of user-specified thresholds to identify abrupt differences in the dropout rate. Second, we proposed the application of 2 existing hypothesis testing methods to detect significant differences in participant dropout. We assessed these methods through a simulation study and through application to a case study, featuring a questionnaire addressing decision-making surrounding cancer screening.

resultsThe user-specified method set to a low threshold performed best at accurately detecting phases of high attrition in both the simulation study and test case application, although all proposed methods were too sensitive.

conclusionsThe user-specified method set to a low threshold correctly identified the attrition phases. Hypothesis testing methods, although sensitive at times, were unable to accurately identify the attrition phases. These results strengthen the case for further development of and research surrounding the science of attrition.

Indexed as

Decision MakingEarly Detection of CancerColorectal NeoplasmsHumansInternetPatient DropoutsSurveys and Questionnairespatient dropoutsstatistical modelssurveys and questionnairessurvival analyses

Identifiers

PMID31444875
PMCPMC6729115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.