ReviewBiophysical reviews2019
Understanding biochemical processes in the presence of sub-diffusive behavior of biomolecules in solution and living cells.
Review in Biophysical reviews, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Molecular Crowding by Computational Approaches.Sub-cellular biochemistry · 2025Review
- Article
- Single-molecule tracking to determine the abundances and stoichiometries of freely-diffusing protein complexes in living cells: Past applications and future prospects.The Journal of chemical physics · 2023Review
- Swarming Transition in Super-Diffusive Self-Propelled Particles.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Look at Tempered Subdiffusion in a Conjugate Map: Desire for the Confinement.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Fractional diffusion on the human proteome as an alternative to the multi-organ damage of SARS-CoV-2.Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.) · 2020Article
- 2019-A year in Biophysical Reviews.Biophysical reviews · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In order to maintain cellular function, biomolecules like protein, DNA, and RNAs have to diffuse to the target spaces within the cell. Changes in the cytosolic microenvironment or in the nucleus during the fulfillment of these cellular processes affect their mobility, folding, and stability thereby impacting the transient or stable interactions with their adjacent neighbors in the organized and dynamic cellular interior. Using classical Brownian motion to elucidate the diffusion behavior of these biomolecules is hard considering their complex nature. The understanding of biomolecular diffusion inside cells still remains elusive due to the lack of a proper model that can be extrapolated to these cases. In this review, we have comprehensively addressed the progresses in this field, laying emphasis on the different aspects of anomalous diffusion in the different biochemical reactions in cell interior. These experiment-based models help to explain the diffusion behavior of biomolecules in the cytosolic and nuclear microenvironment. Moreover, since understanding of biochemical reactions within living cellular system is our main focus, we coupled the experimental observations with the concept of sub-diffusion from in vitro to in vivo condition. We believe that the pairing between the understanding of complex behavior and structure-function paradigm of biological molecules would take us forward by one step in order to solve the puzzle around diseases caused by cellular dysfunction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.