ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2019
Immunotherapy: Checkpoint Inhibitors in Lynch-Associated Gynecologic Cancers.
Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Anticancer potential of osthole: targeting gynecological tumors and breast cancer.Pharmacological reports : PR · 2025Review
- Analyzing pathogenic variants in mismatch repair genes: personalized prevention strategies for lynch syndrome in Chinese families.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Association of a novel frameshift variant and a known deleterious variant in MMR genes with Lynch syndrome in Chinese families.World journal of surgical oncology · 2024Article
- Microbial Colonization and Inflammation as Potential Contributors to the Lack of Therapeutic Success in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Frontiers in oral health · 2021Review
- Article
- Diagnostics of Mutations in MMR/Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Integrated analysis of immune-related genes in endometrial carcinoma.Cancer cell international · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
opinion statementResearch into novel therapies for gynecologic cancers is underfunded, and as a result, we are still playing catchup with other solid tumors in the realm of immune checkpoint inhibition. This is despite the fact that two of the most common gynecologic cancers in the USA have strong biologic rationales for response to these agents. Work is now underway to demonstrate safe and effective therapies for our patients. As we better understand the immune system, and more specifically the tumor microenvironment, we will be able to achieve complete responses. The immune system can learn, adapt, and provide ongoing surveillance; if only we could mimic its abilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31444655What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.