Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31444622›Full record

ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2019

Measurement of range of motions of L3-L4 healthy spine through offsetting reflective markers and in silico analysis of meshed model.

G Kosalishkwaran, S Parasuraman, D Kingsly Jeba Singh, Elango Natarajan, I Elamvazuthi, John George

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

G KosalishkwaranSchool of Engineering, Monash University Malaysia, Jalan Lagoon Selatan, 46150, Bandar Sunway, Selangor, Malaysia.
S ParasuramanSchool of Engineering, Monash University Malaysia, Jalan Lagoon Selatan, 46150, Bandar Sunway, Selangor, Malaysia. s.parasuraman@monash.edu.
D Kingsly Jeba SinghDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, SRM University, Kattankulathur, Tamil Nadu, 603203, India.
Elango NatarajanFaculty of Engineering, UCSI University, Taman Connaught, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
I ElamvazuthiDepartment of Electrical & Electronic Engineering, University Teknologi Petronas, Seri Iskandar, Perak, Malaysia.
John GeorgeResearch Imaging Centre, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Monash University Malaysia · MYSRM University · INUCSI University · MYUniversiti Teknologi Petronas · MYUniversity Malaya Medical Centre · MY

Funding

DST-FIST, India SR / FST/ ETI - 311 / 2012JABATAN PENGAJIAN TINGGI KEMENTERIAN PENDIDIKAN MALAYSIA FRGS/ 1/ 2015 / TK03 / MUSM / 02 / 1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Degenerative disc disease (DDD) is a common condition in elderly population that can be painful and can significantly affect individual's quality of life. Diagnosis of DDD allows prompt corrective actions but it is challenging due to the absence of any symptoms at early stages. In studying disc degeneration, measurement of the range of motion (RoM) and loads acting on the spine are crucial factors. However, direct measurement of RoM involves increased instrumentation and risk. In this paper, an innovative method is proposed for calculating RoM, emphasizing repeatability and reliability by considering the posterior thickness of the spine. This is achieved by offsetting the position of markers in relation to the actual vertebral loci. Three geometrically identical finite element models of L3-L4 are developed from a CT scan with different types of elements, and thereafter, mesh element-related metrics are provided for the assessment of the quality of models. The model with the best mesh quality is used for further analysis, where RoM are within ranges as reported in literature and in vivo experiment results. Various kinds of stresses acting on individual components including facet joints are analysed for normal and abnormal loading conditions. The results showed that the stresses in abnormal load conditions for all components including cortical (76.67 MPa), cancellous (69.18 MPa), annulus (6.30 MPa) and nucleus (0.343 MPa) are significantly greater as compared to normal loads (49.96 MPa, 44.2 MPa, 4.28 MPa and 0.23 MPa respectively). However, stress levels for both conditions are within safe limits (167-215 MPa for cortical, 46 MPa for the annulus and 3 MPa for facets). The results obtained could be used as a baseline motion and stresses of healthy subjects based on their respective lifestyles, which could benefit clinicians to suggest corrective actions for those affected by DDD.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationModels, BiologicalFinite Element AnalysisHumansIntervertebral DiscLumbar VertebraeMaleRange of Motion, ArticularReproducibility of ResultsStress, MechanicalTomography, X-Ray ComputedWeight-BearingYoung AdultBiomechanicsBiomedical image processingIn silicoKinematicsKinesisLumbar spine

Identifiers

PMID31444622
OpenAlexW2969311235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.